|
|
Post by job on May 1, 2012 17:45:08 GMT 3
mwalimumkuuExactly! kamalet's assistant (well one of them anyways) That's a PETITION. ALLEGATIONS if I must spell it out to you. Haven't you heard that I support the right of all accused even WAR CRIMINALS to due process. Still asking for proof from you and kamalet that Mutunga was violent with his ex partner. ANDgood thing that Mutunga didn't abdicate his responsibilities to his children and the women who bore and raise them! That's good for our country. If we had more men like that we wouldn't have children taking their nasty dying fathers to court for all the years of neglect and for inheritance as in the Njega Karume case of his son Thuo. Dial Prof. Lax or attend the court sessions for a verbatim recording of the evidence. Between; what proof do you have that Thuo is late Njenga's son? In some parts of the world, divorce has never been synonymous with wife-beating. I know this may sound bizzare to some folks deeply immersed in a violent patriarchal culture (prevalent in our society) - the very kind Mutunga was in fact addressing....the very kind now quivering in self-guilt here at JUKWAA. If you are a wife-beater, public office won't be for you in the new Kenya, period! Someni Katiba! The guilty are always afraid when caught...always irritated when informed of discomforting new ways (aka reforms)...woe unto the anti-Katiba REDS. It's too late! That's our new law. Mutunga was merely reminding all Kenyans what to expect when seeking public office. There's no need attacking the messenger - stick to the message. These ad hominem attacks on the person of the CJ started during his vetting and have continued throughout his brief tenure. It's totally misguided to imagine that Justice Mutunga would somehow be cowed from commenting on certain crucial matters if the kitchen sink is thrown at him. I bet you will continue hearing the CJ speak about the integrity chapter of the new Constitution. |
|
|
|
Post by OtishOtish on May 1, 2012 20:05:31 GMT 3
Cutting to the chase: We can't have rapists and murderers running for PORK.
|
|
|
|
Post by mwalimumkuu on May 1, 2012 20:27:38 GMT 3
Dial Prof. Lax or attend the court sessions for a verbatim recording of the evidence. Between; what proof do you have that Thuo is late Njenga's son? In some parts of the world, divorce has never been synonymous with wife-beating. I know this may sound bizzare to some folks deeply immersed in a violent patriarchal culture (prevalent in our society) - the very kind Mutunga was in fact addressing....the very kind now quivering in self-guilt here at JUKWAA. If you are a wife-beater, public office won't be for you in the new Kenya, period! Someni Katiba! The guilty are always afraid when caught...always irritated when informed of discomforting new ways (aka reforms)...woe unto the anti-Katiba REDS. It's too late! That's our new law. Mutunga was merely reminding all Kenyans what to expect when seeking public office. There's no need attacking the messenger - stick to the message. These ad hominem attacks on the person of the CJ started during his vetting and have continued throughout his brief tenure. It's totally misguided to imagine that Justice Mutunga would somehow be cowed from commenting on certain crucial matters if the kitchen sink is thrown at him. I bet you will continue hearing the CJ speak about the integrity chapter of the new Constitution. No Job, no lies. If you scroll above your post, you will see verbatim excerpts from Prof. Lax's rejoinder to CJ's accusations. So far, she is yet to be proved wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by job on May 1, 2012 20:40:06 GMT 3
You have been caught trying to peddle falsehoods/lies and cheap innuendo regarding the CJ. You have failed to prove your outlandish white lie. It's better to stop digging further. In some parts of the world, divorce has never been synonymous with wife-beating. I know this may sound bizzare to some folks deeply immersed in a violent patriarchal culture (prevalent in our society) - the very kind Mutunga was in fact addressing....the very kind now quivering in self-guilt here at JUKWAA. If you are a wife-beater, public office won't be for you in the new Kenya, period! Someni Katiba! The guilty are always afraid when caught...always irritated when informed of discomforting new ways (aka reforms)...woe unto the anti-Katiba REDS. It's too late! That's our new law. Mutunga was merely reminding all Kenyans what to expect when seeking public office. There's no need attacking the messenger - stick to the message. These ad hominem attacks on the person of the CJ started during his vetting and have continued throughout his brief tenure. It's totally misguided to imagine that Justice Mutunga would somehow be cowed from commenting on certain crucial matters if the kitchen sink is thrown at him. I bet you will continue hearing the CJ speak about the integrity chapter of the new Constitution. No Job, no lies. If you scroll above your post, you will see verbatim excerpts from Prof. Lax's rejoinder to CJ's accusations. So far, she is yet to be proved wrong. There is absolutely no verbatim excerpt on WIFE BEATING - which must not be confused with a general phrase describing ATTITUDE. The phrase "militant attitude" or "violent attitude" must not be taken to literally mean physical violence. |
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on May 1, 2012 23:01:57 GMT 3
You tell me Mutunga is not interested in Impartial Law? I am telling you he is picking his fights with care. And he knows who to avoid. --Village drunks and 'wife terrorists' of the countryside with political ambitions are stuff I believe local communities can take care of. But the big stuff, Uhuruto backed by the full power of the waning Kibaki regime and the MK-maffia money, is another piece of cake altogether. And that is where the CJ should rise to the occasion, read the law, interpret the law and give his ruling! Or, if he thinks he could be judged prejudical, he should hold his peace until the case comes before him. But selectively choosing to intimidate lesser criminals, while turning a blind eye to the big fish, runs him immidiately unto foul wind for nothing. as just another hypocrite! Look, now he himself is being potrayed as a wife-batterer! he should have been clearcut. Those facing charges of crimes against humanity can not run for any office. Not even for the chairmanship of their own family club! |
|
|
|
Post by merlin on May 2, 2012 0:20:52 GMT 3
You tell me Mutunga is not interested in Impartial Law? I am telling you he is picking his fights with care. And he knows who to avoid. --Village drunks and 'wife terrorists' of the countryside with political ambitions are stuff I believe local communities can take care of. But the big stuff, Uhuruto backed by the full power of the waning Kibaki regime and the MK-maffia money, is another piece of cake altogether. And that is where the CJ should rise to the occasion, read the law, interpret the law and give his ruling! Or, if he thinks he could be judged prejudical, he should hold his peace until the case comes before him. But selectively choosing to intimidate lesser criminals, while turning a blind eye to the big fish, runs him immidiately unto foul wind for nothing. as just another hypocrite! Look, now he himself is being potrayed as a wife-batterer! he should have been clearcut. Those facing charges of crimes against humanity can not run for any office. Not even for the chairmanship of their own family club! Mutunga could not say this. It would be outside the law although it gets shady to understand the issues. According to the constitution is facing charges no case for disqualification to run for office as long you have not exhausted the possibilities to appeal. This is why Mutunga said; “if you are found” to have been violent and this needs again an interpretation. |
|
|
|
Post by kasuku on May 2, 2012 11:12:59 GMT 3
kamaletYour arsenal consists of lies and misogyny. You still haven't given the prove to support you claim. Since you insist, here are excerpts from the petition: In her cross petition, Lax accused Mutunga of having a "violent and uncaring attitude" towards her and said he "concealed the existence of his relationship with women whom he had sired children with".The petition claims that Mutunga concealed from her the financial assistance he was giving to his children and that he "kept an open relationship with his former wife". In 2008, Mutunga gave some Tanzanian stools to a friend but Prof Lax claims she discovered they were given to a former girlfriend. Lax's petition also claims that in 2008 "he had a business trip while he had all along planned to visit two of his girlfriends in Canada." Lax also says Mutunga "denied the Respondent her conjugal rights" and did not visit her in New York when she was in hospital having treatment for hepatitis. Lax complained that Mutunga informed her of his decision to divorce her by email while her mother was battling with cancer. [/b] [/quote] Headticha! I am deeply shocked and ashamed of seeing men, who say they are head teachers, behaving like brainless, lazy and bored village gossipers This Petition of Prof Lax is obvious (my understanding it when she is insulting the man's children) a petition made by of a very sickly jealous woman thrown out of marriage. How can you, you Headticha use it as an argument that the CJ is a Woman Batterer? And furthermore, you don’t expect the CJ to be so thick as to warn Violent men when he self is violent? Please men, show some dignity |
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on May 2, 2012 11:20:55 GMT 3
Since you insist, here are excerpts from the petition: In her cross petition, Lax accused Mutunga of having a "violent and uncaring attitude" towards her and said he "concealed the existence of his relationship with women whom he had sired children with".The petition claims that Mutunga concealed from her the financial assistance he was giving to his children and that he "kept an open relationship with his former wife". In 2008, Mutunga gave some Tanzanian stools to a friend but Prof Lax claims she discovered they were given to a former girlfriend. Lax's petition also claims that in 2008 "he had a business trip while he had all along planned to visit two of his girlfriends in Canada." Lax also says Mutunga "denied the Respondent her conjugal rights" and did not visit her in New York when she was in hospital having treatment for hepatitis. Lax complained that Mutunga informed her of his decision to divorce her by email while her mother was battling with cancer. [/b] [/quote] Headticha! I am deeply shocked and ashamed of seeing men, who say they are head teachers, behaving like brainless, lazy and bored village gossipers This Petition of Prof Lax is obvious that it is a petition made by of a very sickly jealous woman thrown out of marriage. How can you, you Headticha use it as an argument that the CJ is a Woman Batterer? And furthermore, you don’t expect the CJ to be so thick as to warn Violent men when he self is violent? Please men, show some dignity [/quote] Kasuku Is that your view of women thrown out of marriage that they are sickly and jealous? She complains of a philanderer who sadly is our CJ and you actually want to ascribe intelligence on him? Here is a bet for you - Mutunga will perhaps be the shortest serving CJ Kenya has. Usicheze with our new constitution! |
|
|
|
Post by kasuku on May 2, 2012 17:13:31 GMT 3
Kasuku Is that your view of women thrown out of marriage that they are sickly and jealous? Usicheze with our new constitution! Since when did ONE Woman represent all women of this world? That’s the problem with men who refuse to grow up and respect women as individuals. You seem to know zero about women |
|
|
|
Post by job on May 2, 2012 17:50:31 GMT 3
Here is a bet for you - Mutunga will perhaps be the shortest serving CJ Kenya has. Usicheze with our new constitution! This is laughable! Isn't it interesting that those who opposed the new Constitution like Kamale and Mwalimumkuu; the same people who cheered the botched attempt by Kibaki to force anti-reformist imposters as CJ & Deputy; the same people who made mountains out of Mutunga's ear stud - maligning his character day-in-day-out - as they opposed his appointment; are now BETTING he'll soon be out of office. How audacious!!!!!!!Right in front of our eyes (@ JUKWAA) we're witnessing how the anti-reformers and reluctant reactionaries, like predatory snakes, quickly pounce to make hay out of non-issues. This pattern of witch hunt was noted much earlier. They started maligning Mutunga during the vetting process. The NSIS dug up all they could on him - and conjured sensational homophobic tales about his trademark ear-stud. The pro-PNU Church wing ran with this to incite their adherents. It failed! They may have also searched for his (probably jilted) ex-wife with great ideas - to embarrass the CJ and carpet-bomb his character. It will also fail miserably! A desperate Uhuruto crowd comprising the Kamales and Mwalimumkuus now wants to turn figurative language used subjectively by Mutunga's (probably jilted) ex to paint the affable and genial CJ as a violent man not deserving to hold that office. Subjective use of the phrase "violent attitude" {it is attitude being described; by the verb violent} is being twisted to literally mean physical violence. Helloooooo! Then where is the P-3 form, doctor's note, and battery case in court? Jaribuni ingine! Tuko macho! Of course the Uhuruto crowd is fearful of Mutunga...sensing what lies ahead as the CJ gets more comfortable in his new assignment. William Ruto's concerns are his unending cases - such as Muteshi's eviction from his 100 acre farm - which are reaching a reformed Judiciary. Ruto already knows what Mutunga felt of the soon-to-be-vetted-out Chief Magistrate Gilbert Mutembei who threw off Ruto's other Ngong-Forest land-grab case. Shortly after the Magistrate acquitted Ruto in the Ngong case, Mutunga appropriately termed Mutembei "a conveyor belt for court acquitals". There will soon be no more Mutembeis to save Ruto through Judicial Hail Mary passes. Mutunga's sarcastic jibe was a warning shot to the Uhuruto mob. An equally jittery Uhuru has also been stung by Mutunga's remark on strict adherence to the Integrity Chapter of the Constitution; for those aspiring public office. The Uhuruto tummies are rumbling like earthquakes and tornadoes. Their drowning supporters have started searching fine straws. Well, here is bankable news to the Kamales and Mwalimumkuus: Chief Justice Mutunga is going nowhere! Forget your empty threats. He is at the helm of the Judiciary to stay. Any attempt to play chicken-games can lead to a backlash you haven't probably imagined (locally and internationally). The ICC-besieged Uhuru and Ruto must be reminded that Mutunga's appointment was the first symbolic sign of reforms in Kenya's Judiciary. Take him out, and we have no courts that Kenyans can trust or approach...the same scenario we were in during PEV. We shall be back to the dogs. I know the Uhuruto dreamers still fear Mutunga (whom they detained without trial in the past) would ultimately become their worst nightmare. Oh yes, you bet! They already read Mutunga's intention to use the platform of the Supreme Court to bring order in the country. That's heck why I insist (without fear of contradiction, and for the umpteenth time) that these anti-reformers have started reconstituting the Supreme Court - read Nancy Baraza's fate. Through the same tactics, they patiently stalked and pounced on her when the opportunity arose. They knew she loved her drink; and had a post-drink attitude problem. They nabbed Nancy Baraza off-guard - tipsy and arrogant. They brought all the big megaphones, TV cameras, and splashed it on all mainstream headlines. A nose-pinching incident turned into a case of attempted murder. Baraza was the arrogant and heartless villain; the security guard, the dutiful, polite victim. The succesfully made a huge mountain of it. Politicians chimed in with their amplifiers. The public was succesfully incited; a guerrilla sting well executed. Even Mutunga and the JSC had no choice but escort their colleague out. One-out, one more to go; and the Supreme Court mirrors their dream! It's important to note that the character maligning didn't start after their appointments. Both Mutunga and Baraza's reputation were severely tested during vetting. Anti-reformists had earlier tried maligning Baraza through homophobic (lesbian tale) tactics. Remember these were the only two Supreme Court Judges considered unsafe activists. I guess, a political activist (& former PNU nominated MP) like Njoki Ndung'u won't suffer vicious gang-ho tactics from the NSIS. I view all these things through the same lens - many don't believe when I tell them Baraza was specifically profiled, stalked and eventually nabbed for misconduct; as a way to reconstitute the Supreme Court. She was the weakest link they could get first. They did. She's out. The same anti-reform forces are now imagining they can catch Mutunga through discomforting piece-meal details leaked from his on-going divorce case. Of course they want to intimidate Mutunga to "slow down" the Judicial reform process. They would wish for interpretation of laws in a manner that doesn't endanger their survival. Therefore, they get goose bumps and standing hair when Mutunga waxes lyrical about the Integrity Chapter of the new Constitution. In response, it's now a season for witch hunt and threats - ati he will be the shortest serving CJ! Wapiiiiiii!!!!!!! We have seen these tactics before. Once beaten twice shy. I doubt they would do another Baraza on any of these vetted Judges. That lesson was very clear. |
|
|
|
Post by mwalimumkuu on May 2, 2012 17:58:40 GMT 3
Since you insist, here are excerpts from the petition: In her cross petition, Lax accused Mutunga of having a "violent and uncaring attitude" towards her and said he "concealed the existence of his relationship with women whom he had sired children with".The petition claims that Mutunga concealed from her the financial assistance he was giving to his children and that he "kept an open relationship with his former wife". In 2008, Mutunga gave some Tanzanian stools to a friend but Prof Lax claims she discovered they were given to a former girlfriend. Lax's petition also claims that in 2008 "he had a business trip while he had all along planned to visit two of his girlfriends in Canada." Lax also says Mutunga "denied the Respondent her conjugal rights" and did not visit her in New York when she was in hospital having treatment for hepatitis. Lax complained that Mutunga informed her of his decision to divorce her by email while her mother was battling with cancer. [/b] [/quote] Headticha! I am deeply shocked and ashamed of seeing men, who say they are head teachers, behaving like brainless, lazy and bored village gossipers This Petition of Prof Lax is obvious that it is a petition made by of a very sickly jealous woman thrown out of marriage. How can you, you Headticha use it as an argument that the CJ is a Woman Batterer? And furthermore, you don’t expect the CJ to be so thick as to warn Violent men when he self is violent? Please men, show some dignity [/quote] Kasuku,I am surely and equally shocked at your slander. Sisemi kitu, maybe Kathure will. |
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on May 2, 2012 19:31:52 GMT 3
[ Jakaswanga,Mutunga could not say this. It would be outside the law although it gets shady to understand the issues. According to the constitution is facing charges no case for disqualification to run for office as long you have not exhausted the possibilities to appeal. This is why Mutunga said; “if you are found” to have been violent and this needs again an interpretation. Merlin, So Mutula Kilonzo's [before Eugene came in] the two can not run, was just a matter of opinion, one of the possible interpretations of the integrity clause!? --Some integrity clause that! When suspected war criminals can run for the presidency of my country, I personally have no faith in those integrity clauses! If there is no law which can be categorically quoted as barring Uhuruto before they are actually sentenced, then they can be on the ballot! and will be on the ballot! With the farcical probability of UK being elected president only to be sentenced, and thus disqualified from office! What a spectacle it would be, as he explains why he can not relinquish the presidency inspite of his conviction! and a section of the society rises up with resign! resign! And what a brute he would be, if he is cleared of all the charges while he is president! |
|
|
|
Post by job on May 2, 2012 19:52:18 GMT 3
[ Jakaswanga,Mutunga could not say this. It would be outside the law although it gets shady to understand the issues. According to the constitution is facing charges no case for disqualification to run for office as long you have not exhausted the possibilities to appeal. This is why Mutunga said; “if you are found” to have been violent and this needs again an interpretation. Merlin, So Mutula Kilonzo's [before Eugene came in] the two can not run, was just a matter of opinion, one of the possible interpretations of the integrity clause!? --Some integrity clause that! When suspected war criminals can run for the presidency of my country, I personally have no faith in those integrity clauses! If there is no law which can be categorically quoted as barring Uhuruto before they are actually sentenced, then they can be on the ballot! and will be on the ballot! With the farcical probability of UK being elected president only to be sentenced, and thus disqualified from office! What a spectacle it would be, as he explains why he can not relinquish the presidency inspite of his conviction! and a section of the society rises up with resign! resign! And what a brute he would be, if he is cleared of all the charges while he is president! Parliament has made every effort to water-down subsidiary legislation that erodes the leter and spirit of that Integrity Chapter of the Constitution. I am also seeing a very calculated and smoothly choreographed reconstitution of the Supreme Court (that started with Nancy Baraza's purge) in the event a dispute regarding this matter reaches their bench. I strongly suspect Uhuru will be on the ballot, so long as ICC doesn't detain him on a warrant during his trial. Your postulation about possibility of an al-Bashir-like situation in Kenya has been raised a couple of times by Adongo...who also imagined a scenario of a President Uhuru being convicted at the ICC then Kenyans go to court to kick him out of the Presidency under Chapter 6 of Katiba. |
|
|
|
Post by merlin on May 2, 2012 23:14:56 GMT 3
[ Jakaswanga,Mutunga could not say this. It would be outside the law although it gets shady to understand the issues. According to the constitution is facing charges no case for disqualification to run for office as long you have not exhausted the possibilities to appeal. This is why Mutunga said; “if you are found” to have been violent and this needs again an interpretation. Merlin, So Mutula Kilonzo's [before Eugene came in] the two can not run, was just a matter of opinion, one of the possible interpretations of the integrity clause!? --Some integrity clause that! When suspected war criminals can run for the presidency of my country, I personally have no faith in those integrity clauses! If there is no law which can be categorically quoted as barring Uhuruto before they are actually sentenced, then they can be on the ballot! and will be on the ballot! With the farcical probability of UK being elected president only to be sentenced, and thus disqualified from office! What a spectacle it would be, as he explains why he can not relinquish the presidency inspite of his conviction! and a section of the society rises up with resign! resign! And what a brute he would be, if he is cleared of all the charges while he is president! Jakaswanga, It is not the law which should stop Uhuru from become President. It is the citizens of our Nation who should detest voting for a suspect of crimes against humanity. It is the integrity of the citizenry who should halt the nonsense of Uhuru. Maybe it is the citizenry who is on trail at the ICC? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2012 5:28:28 GMT 3
Since you insist, here are excerpts from the petition: In her cross petition, Lax accused Mutunga of having a "violent and uncaring attitude" towards her and said he "concealed the existence of his relationship with women whom he had sired children with".The petition claims that Mutunga concealed from her the financial assistance he was giving to his children and that he "kept an open relationship with his former wife". In 2008, Mutunga gave some Tanzanian stools to a friend but Prof Lax claims she discovered they were given to a former girlfriend. Lax's petition also claims that in 2008 "he had a business trip while he had all along planned to visit two of his girlfriends in Canada." Lax also says Mutunga "denied the Respondent her conjugal rights" and did not visit her in New York when she was in hospital having treatment for hepatitis. Lax complained that Mutunga informed her of his decision to divorce her by email while her mother was battling with cancer. [/b] [/quote] Headticha! I am deeply shocked and ashamed of seeing men, who say they are head teachers, behaving like brainless, lazy and bored village gossipers This Petition of Prof Lax is obvious (my understanding it when she is insulting the man's children) a petition made by of a very sickly jealous woman thrown out of marriage. How can you, you Headticha use it as an argument that the CJ is a Woman Batterer? And furthermore, you don’t expect the CJ to be so thick as to warn Violent men when he self is violent? Please men, show some dignity [/quote] kasukuI'm appalled but not surprised by your comments here. I'll be back to explain why. |
|
|
|
Post by kasuku on May 3, 2012 12:14:04 GMT 3
Headticha! I am deeply shocked and ashamed of seeing men, who say they are head teachers, behaving like brainless, lazy and bored village gossipers This Petition of Prof Lax is obvious (my understanding it when she is insulting the man's children) a petition made by of a very sickly jealous woman thrown out of marriage. How can you, you Headticha use it as an argument that the CJ is a Woman Batterer? And furthermore, you don’t expect the CJ to be so thick as to warn Violent men when he self is violent? Please men, show some dignity I'm appalled but not surprised by your comments here. I'll be back to explain why. Kathure You have all the right to be appalled...I am also appalled with myself for being dragged into other people's private life by shameless wazees calling themselves headtichas. I shouldn't have let that happen, aber what do they say, it's out! |
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on May 3, 2012 12:22:41 GMT 3
Kasuku Is that your view of women thrown out of marriage that they are sickly and jealous? Usicheze with our new constitution! Since when did ONE Woman represent all women of this world? That’s the problem with men who refuse to grow up and respect women as individuals. You seem to know zero about women Kasuku Is that a question you really would like to ask anyone of my harem..... about knowing zero about women???  |
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on May 3, 2012 12:25:37 GMT 3
Merlin, So Mutula Kilonzo's [before Eugene came in] the two can not run, was just a matter of opinion, one of the possible interpretations of the integrity clause!? --Some integrity clause that! When suspected war criminals can run for the presidency of my country, I personally have no faith in those integrity clauses! If there is no law which can be categorically quoted as barring Uhuruto before they are actually sentenced, then they can be on the ballot! and will be on the ballot! With the farcical probability of UK being elected president only to be sentenced, and thus disqualified from office! What a spectacle it would be, as he explains why he can not relinquish the presidency inspite of his conviction! and a section of the society rises up with resign! resign! And what a brute he would be, if he is cleared of all the charges while he is president! Jakaswanga, It is not the law which should stop Uhuru from become President. It is the citizens of our Nation who should detest voting for a suspect of crimes against humanity. It is the integrity of the citizenry who should halt the nonsense of Uhuru. Maybe it is the citizenry who is on trail at the ICC? Well said!!! |
|
|
|
Post by kasuku on May 3, 2012 12:36:53 GMT 3
Since when did ONE Woman represent all women of this world? That’s the problem with men who refuse to grow up and respect women as individuals. You seem to know zero about women Kasuku Is that a question you really would like to ask anyone of my harem..... about knowing zero about women??? Oh you keep men in your harem? Take my advice mzee kamale...don't trait on slippery grounds by trying to pretend you are a woman knower. A wise man would rather leave quietly than shamelessly slip in front of the amused Ladies and gentlemen. |
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on May 3, 2012 13:20:58 GMT 3
Kasuku Is that a question you really would like to ask anyone of my harem..... about knowing zero about women??? Oh you keep men in your harem? Take my advice mzee kamale...don't trait on slippery grounds by trying to pretend you are a woman knower. A wise man would rather leave quietly than shamelessly slip in front of the amused Ladies and gentlemen. Kasuku......you getting pretty slippery grounds now by trying to allude am a homophobic slur. Yes I know my women very well, and they do know when to open their mouths! You would never find yourself in their good company do have no fear. |
|
|
|
Post by kasuku on May 3, 2012 14:46:08 GMT 3
Oh you keep men in your harem? Take my advice mzee kamale...don't trait on slippery grounds by trying to pretend you are a woman knower. A wise man would rather leave quietly than shamelessly slip in front of the amused Ladies and gentlemen. Kasuku......you getting pretty slippery grounds now by trying to allude am a homophobic slur. Yes I know my women very well, and they do know when to open their mouths! You would never find yourself in their good company do have no fear. Mzee kamare...I don't think your women will appreciate you talking about them in a political Forum And..its you who asked if i would ask your harem inhabitants if they knew anything about women...i don't remember saying that women don't know anything about women in that case i took it you mean there are men in your harem...and i would care less if that was so. And..this is my last repond to this crap. I ksense when someone is misleading by twisting words. Go look for another for-play |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2012 6:23:41 GMT 3
kamaletYour arsenal consists of lies and misogyny. You still haven't given the prove to support you claim. Since you insist, here are excerpts from the petition: In her cross petition, Lax accused Mutunga of having a "violent and uncaring attitude" towards her and said he "concealed the existence of his relationship with women whom he had sired children with".The petition claims that Mutunga concealed from her the financial assistance he was giving to his children and that he "kept an open relationship with his former wife". In 2008, Mutunga gave some Tanzanian stools to a friend but Prof Lax claims she discovered they were given to a former girlfriend. Lax's petition also claims that in 2008 "he had a business trip while he had all along planned to visit two of his girlfriends in Canada." Lax also says Mutunga "denied the Respondent her conjugal rights" and did not visit her in New York when she was in hospital having treatment for hepatitis. Lax complained that Mutunga informed her of his decision to divorce her by email while her mother was battling with cancer. [/b] [/quote] mwalimumkuuI addressed kamalet and he instructed you to respond to the lie that he has been advancing here about Mutunga; most likely to avoid being sued for defamation. In doing so you went ahead to lift word for word from an article published by the Star on May 21st, 2011 without giving credit to the source. Now that's called plagiarism. By so doing you've further exposed yourselves for the liars that you are working hard for team Satan. In just a few short months we'll see how far that goes. Get all the loot you can now, while the goings good. www.the-star.co.ke/national/national/25209-mutunga-divorce- |
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on May 4, 2012 23:04:51 GMT 3
|
|
|
|
Post by tnk on May 5, 2012 0:48:41 GMT 3
sorry buddy not sure whether its by accident or by design, i will assume its by design the standard changed their web presence/game a few months back i think early January and have "blocked" the e-pirates that we are, from scoring points with their images. i believe they have applied some url rewrite so that if you attempt to embed an image from their site it will display a thumbnail (not sure whether this applies across the board or not - have limited time to explore) in essence they want you to provide the full link as you did above, so that your audience are compeled to visit their website (rather than get a sneak preview - thus denying them hard earned click revenue i.e click-e-cash or click$ from traffic) and they get full credit (and of course associated kshs) for their work - no more free e-lunch so to speak so no more this (may display briefly and then revert to thumbnail)  instead they want you to do this bofya hapa/bonyeza of course if it is inadvertent, then they need to make this a permanent feature so that due credit is given |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2012 6:09:15 GMT 3
Leadership and integrity issues involve much more than criminal convictions
By MAINA KIAI
Posted Friday, May 18 2012 at 19:59
This is the standard that all public officers must meet. If it is fair and just for judicial officers then it is fair and just for civil servants, MPs and ministers.
There should be major scalps along the way. For how will Uhuru Kenyatta, Njeru Githae, Joseph Kinyua and mandarins at the Treasury explain their disdain for the Constitution in budgeting and borrowing matters?
How will they explain the Sh480 billion discrepancy in the revenue accounts for 2007/8, which was an election year? How will Anyang’ Nyong’o explain Clinix in this election year or Amos Kimunya, the KPA Board?
The Public Officer Ethics Act is a small Act and would-be public officers are advised to read and memorise it. For while it previously went un-implemented, with a new Constitution and a Judiciary determined to give it expression, times have changed.
They better change too or be caught up in the tsunami that is the new Kenya we demand.
This is the standard that all public officers must meet. If it is fair and just for judicial officers then it is fair and just for civil servants, MPs and ministers.
There should be major scalps along the way. For how will Uhuru Kenyatta, Njeru Githae, Joseph Kinyua and mandarins at the Treasury explain their disdain for the Constitution in budgeting and borrowing matters?
How will they explain the Sh480 billion discrepancy in the revenue accounts for 2007/8, which was an election year? How will Anyang’ Nyong’o explain Clinix in this election year or Amos Kimunya, the KPA Board?
The Public Officer Ethics Act is a small Act and would-be public officers are advised to read and memorise it. For while it previously went un-implemented, with a new Constitution and a Judiciary determined to give it expression, times have changed.
They better change too or be caught up in the tsunami that is the new Kenya we demand.
kiai2000@yahoo.com
|
|
