|
Post by jakaswanga on Jul 19, 2014 15:38:03 GMT 3
---There is something rotten at the heart of the British establishment! and the stench covers the whole Kingdom in shame. The rich, the powerful and the famous turned the country's orphanages into paradises for the sexual molestation of children. And have gone to great lengths to cover up their satanic bestiality. Ha!to every country, the scandal they deserve! Believe it or not, The Home Office has lost an excess of 114 Files. All dealing with a particularly sensitive case. An establishment-shaking case. As Great Departments of state (of her Majesty’s government) go, they do not come grander than the HO. It is arguable the most important office at WhiteHall. This is where Q and M, those great runners of the unloosing spy James Bond, have their liars. MI5 or MI6? can’t be too sure of these things. Subterfuge and disinformation are their Christian names. But rest assured the HO is the nerve centre of the invincible SCOTLAND YARD, and of course, the legendary Metropolitan Police. The homes of super sleuths James Biggles, and of course, the legendary Sherlock Holmes! Aaah! Fancy Reputations! Only as good as the last case!THE GREAT ROTTEN BRITAINGreat Britain is rotten? No, redirect. To The British Establishment is rotten! No, that is not news. But still! Okay, 114 files is less than Ngilu’s 1.3 Million lost-and-founds. But if we remember the 114 contain a comprehensive list of child rapists at the top of the British establishment! Then WOW! its impact is more atomic than the doctoring out of Uhuru Kenyatta’s names from parcels, presided over by our Madame of Charity. No, these Brits are in another league! And the Kenyan tourist industry should be re-examined, in the sense of a paedophile screening instituted. Poor countries are a magnet for these kind of predators, because such poor countries do not have much protection for the sexual vitals of their children, many of them on the margins on the streets. Our countries are a paedophile’s paradise. And not exactly unwittingly. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/paedophile-ring-leader-colin-peters-linked-to-barnes-scandal-8518078.html www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2012/11/06/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-tory-paedophile-scandal When I first heard these specific files were missing from the Home Office, I behaved like a 10-year old dim wit who has suddenly flung open the bedroom door, and caught Mum and Dad in a 69 deep into one another’s groins, each going at eat meatily, punctuated with heightened soundtrack accompaniments. The innocent child inquires politely what is up? And the parents, keen to spare the youngster’s mind from the ravages of adulthood, come up with some cock and bull story to cover up the sheepish looks on their disturbed faces. The child trusts the parents and accepts the story in her innocence, nevertheless there lingers a humanoid scepticism at the back of the child’s mind, even though she can not articulate it yet. But out there in the playfield where ages are mixed and development uneven, she will greedily be informed of what exactly was up in that bedroom. She will learn the very English phrase, caught pants down.
The discovery that even trusted people can lie, becomes the beginning of her shock therapy which will serve as an initiation into the ways of the world. Hypocrisy and outrageous lies, she becomes aware, may just turn out to be one of her best friends, if she is to make a high career, in high office, in any establishment.If I have been harsh on the head of our own MI5&6 --Major General Gichangi, ridiculing him with Mwalimkuu’s favourite line –that the NISS if full of Kaka Mbweha tales and Sir. Michael is a major Juha Kalulu intelligence chief, this could be the time to do a mea culpa. You see, the British intelligence services rank up there past Mossad and the rest. So if 114 files disappear from under their noses, well, we can only quote Jaramogi Odinga: even God makes mistakes . --- Om Shanti! Shanti! Shanti!While James Bond aka 007 was abroad on her majesty’s secret service, saving the world from villains like the golden-gunned Scaramanga (or was that Osama bin Ladin); or Robert Mugabe … (Ian Smith’s Selous Scouts were intensely briefed by British intelligence from their experience in Northern Ireland, some troubles with the IRA I think!) … etc etc; back at home, Bond’s bosses were enjoying themselves silly, jerking off in events which reduce the recent paedophile scandal in the Catholic Church to helpless amateurism. The Eton-Oxbridge chain of elites running the British establishment and their media celebrity counterparts, were dragging British kids off orphanages, ferrying them to dark castles and luxurious secret locations, drugging them to neutralise their wills or simulate a corpse-like status for the likes of Jimmy Savile who had that preference, then proceeding to exact their twisted sexuality unabated. Decades on end! No, Sherlock Holmes could not crack this one. Neither time nor money to follow it up you know! www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/06/27/how-bbc-star-jimmy-savile-got-away-with-allegedely-abusing-500-children-and-sex-with-dead-bodies/ And super-hero James Bond? Aah, he was mostly abroad. May be a product of the abusive orphanages himself, exporting his rage to coloureds, coolies, wogs and other such lowlies. NB: There are these stories about safe-houses commissioned in dark lands run by dark regimes. They served ss extra-judicial rendition bases for Western Intelligence agencies. In effect, dungeons which were paradises for enhanced interrogation techniques which, according to Tony Blair, British officers may have been present at but did not participate in –they looked the other way, shying from the ‘robustness’ that got answers that saved Britain. Now it looks like at home too, there were darkish safe houses where ‘ enhanced and robust sexual practices’ were conducted on hapless kids, and the mannered intelligence services of England, looked the other way. Now that is breeding!When the best intelligence and police investigating departments of the world are procured to enjoin their eilite in the tearing to pieces of the immature, therefore unyielding orifices of orphaned youngsters of their own country! The world upside down. And the word ‘’rotten’’ will do I think. NB: Prime Minister David Cameron went on the rampage this week upon his cabinet in what has been dubbed THE GREAT CULL OF THE MIDDLE-AGED WHITE MEN! Hmm, he knows a thing or two about the things middle aged white men do! does he?
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Jul 26, 2014 9:09:37 GMT 3
www.dw.de/uk-criticizes-arms-exports-to-russia-then-confirms-its-own/a-17801315David Cameron can be a bit of a diva. He is in the habit of displaying these Tantrums which have made him a bit of a joke in continental Europe. We saw this during the John Junk issue - Jean Claude Juncker as president of the EU council; during the rebates in which he continued the tradition of irrational intransigence set by her predecessor Maggie Thatcher; and during negotiations toward an EU banking standard. This he argued was a FRENCH PLOT based on jealousy, to cap the leading role of London as a financial center. Now Davy boy has been at it again, following the downing of flight MH 017 over East Ukraine. HE HAS BECOME a leading hawk, condemning the appeasement attitude of the Eu toward Russia, blaming them for being in the pockets of Putin. HE SINGLED OUT French advanced weapons sales to Russia. -among these, France is scheduled to deliver an older, and build a newer aircraft carrier for the Russian navy .... based at the 'annexed' Crimea! Treachery! Yelled David Cameron. And then the worms started to crawl out of the woodwork. The Conservative Party of Cameron is aa good as in the pockets of Russian oligarch money. They fund the party, and as late as this week, Cameron and mayor Johnson of London were still auctioning their company to Russian oligarch money: tennis for cash. A Russian lobbyist paying over £170,000 to play tennis with the two Etonian barons. As the link above suggests. The continental press has been in a killing mood. Telling davy boy off, driving the sword home, at just how rotten he himself is, and, talking of being compromised, london was always reluctant on financial sanctions that could bite, and guess why.? Coz russian oligarch loot is the golden egg at the city. David Cameron, they want him to sort his own house first. Like the Scottish secession which is looming. Then can he shout at European chicanery, and get humour for response instead of kicking put downs! nb: it should be noted France is min an economic slide and can use all the trade it can get. We recently saw their industrial elite troop to Tehran, to cash in on the goodwill -that episode which has earned BNP Paribas a record fine from the USA.
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Sept 8, 2014 22:55:42 GMT 3
DOGVILLE ENGLAND 1,400 Children in Rotherham, England, Were Sexually Abused, Report Says AUG. 26, 2014 www.nytimes.com/2014/09/02/world/europe/reckoning-starts-in-britain-on-abuse-of-girls.html?_r=0 The idea is, Pakistani/ethnic minority gangs grooming selected impressionable white girls for sexual exploitation, abuse and degradation long term! Britain's rotten community relations! NB: I know we are tribalistic here in Kenya, but the idea of Kikuyu gang specialised in the grooming of exclusively Kamba girls to be used as sexual toys and passed around and sold around for further misuse, I have not come across. Nor have I come across tales of Christian men specialising in the sexual exploitation of vulnerable Muslim children; nor heard of Kamba gangs specialised in the ritual rape of feeble-minded MjiKenda teenagers! For the ethnic targeting of the children of the other for sexual abuse, it takes war –like was in the Congo! Under peace? Nah! Yet in Great Britain, that is the fashion! I redirect: African teenage girls and women are ritually raped and abused by the so called UN or African peacekeepers. --I just been reading the report from Somalia, detailing what Burundi and Ugandan soldiers specialise in, as entertainment outside Shabab combat hours. The French paratroopers and their local pimps also ran a who-re house or brothel specialising in underage African girls at Bangui camp, outside the Bangui airport. You saw how Michelle Obama posed in the Boko Haram bring our girls shot? I bet over the systematic rape of underage girls by United Nations peace-keepers is news they do not let her come across! here below is a satirical from France. Dogville Engeland!
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Sept 8, 2014 23:05:12 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Sept 15, 2014 21:00:54 GMT 3
SCOTLAND DECIDES, A PERSONAL NIGHTMARE.When I say rotten Britain, I do not mean she should wither away; nor do I wish she would fall by the wayside of History, and disappear into the famous ash-heap. Rather, I wish she should be reborn, the union refurbished and retooled into a crack entity capable of making sense of herself in this changed world where Brittania no longer rules anything, not even Westminster. Yes, the UK is currently lost in the big world methinks. Yes, her elite, captive to nostalgia, believes she is great, and, give or take, punches above her weight around the globe; but everybody knows this role is only as the poodle of the real power, the USA. This situation may be great to the occupants of the lofty No 10 Downing Street, but downstairs and on the streets of the Kingdom, it is hurting. Bad. Scots want away, to spend their money otherwise, -say, conform priorities closer to home, than expensive war-mongering across already unstable continents. Restive minorities of other faiths but British to the bone, want a new deal in foreign policy too: –-where the White elite is firmly wedded to Israel whatever she does, they, on the other hand, are on the Palestinian side. And Lo! the hiatus has become a Jekyl and Hide narrative. One nation, two hearts. As white pilots in the Royal Airforce prepare to bomb IS –-the notorious caliphate straddling Syria and Iraq, it will be their homeboys –-- Jihad Johns from Manchester, Gloucester, London, you name it---, who they will be striving to kill. For Premier David Cameron, the war against IS is therefore a British civil war. No two ways about it. Brits kill Brits it be. And when you colour it up with religion and colour, the British civil war abroad becomes ever darker, ever nastier. And it concerns me more than I cared to admit. I have my colonial hangovers , I am a Brit . Kind of. More of a Scot –-God-dam-n it! at this rate next time I will say I am white, Frantz Fanon style. At the end of this week I could have committed intellectual suicide. That sounds very dramatic, but there is no way of understating it. Pray for me, poor soul, those of you whose hearts are not yet poisoned with enough doubt to be agnostics, nor wholly surrendered to materialist philosophy and become atheists. Pray for me poor soul, I beseech thee! So what is up? In one word. Scotland, In two words, United Kingdom. In three, referendum, yes or no!? I am politically a Unionist, and my emotions and mental infrastructure is vested in Unionist ideals. I have always been an ardent supporter of this Union –-the United Kingdom. I found it exemplary and enlightened. A working example of good living together for a separate peoples in one political union. A lot of live, and let live. ##(of course after a long period of bloody civil wars)## If the Union collapses thursday, my mind will melt down. All sense shall evaporate, leaving a residue of cynicism. At the end of this post I will tell you the OTHER why. Really, if such success as the UK has had does not guarantee a continuing Union of nations, what the hell does?If the UK collapses on Thursday night, a lot of things I consider civilised will be blown apart. And that is what I call intellectual suicide. I imagine it can also be called something else less dramatic, and less tragic. Just another move on situation. Nevertheless I know I will feel suicidal. Secessions depress me! They insult my belief in human solidarity ... the ability to overcome ''constructed'' differences, the capacity to surmount compartmentalised consciousness. O sorry sorry me! I am actually going to be there on that fateful night (Scotland referendum). It could be historic and I want to be there for any number of reasons. To that purpose have I connected with an old flame, and she will host me. She is a nationalist and will be voting yes to independence. To explain her yes, she mailed this to me, ''we have a great past, and definitely will have a great present, but there is no great future together. We will stay in touch though, available even in love, your favourite diet of Scottish passion-fruit soiled in tempered scotch, negotiable!''True, but cold and disconcerting nevertheless. Being dispensable and disposable is unsettling. Great Britain without Scotland is a rump, an amputee who wouldn't qualify for the paralympics, yet will insist on going for gold at the Olympics. –-She will insist on her veto and permanent seat at the United Nations security council. A laughable joke. Lots of Scots no longer seem to want to pay for the Greatness in Britain. Or more precisely, they do not want to pay high taxes to keep up that appearance. (Instead of nuclear arsenals and military adventures abroad playing world cop as a USA dog, Scots want less bonuses to bankers, but more spending on kindergarten's, schools and bursaries to make education less costly, especially university fees, so to make it available for all and not a monopoly of the haves. And they want much more integration into the European Union, being more favourable to the Euro than the rabidly eurosceptic English neighbours. In fact it looks a paradox, quitting one Union to join another, even if not similar. Yes, I suppose some embraces are more stifling than others! For no sooner had the Baltic states quit the Soviet Union than they surrendered their independence to the European Union!)There is also this other fact: a bit delicate, but nations have their subconscious too. Scotland is whiter than England. And more viking than saxon. England with her third-world like inner cities –-Birmingham, Manchester, London-- where, as we have mused earlier, Jihad Johns with perfect upper class English accents are bred, may in deed seem to be facing a very scary future, not to mention the primitive sectarianism of the Ireland that is part of her. And with English nationalism undeniably rising, there could be an instinctive recognition by Scots that, better they live apart together, more white and safe! The long happy marriage –-that birthed the multicultural nightmare as a collateral effect-- has run its course. It scares me. This drive toward breakage. The Union of Scotland and England was the crucible of the industrial revolution; that is a great achievement, even if, as my old flame claims, a great joint past is no guarantee of a great future together. People change, reality changes, circumstances change. Everything changes over time. Unions they come, unions they go. To paraphrase Valerie Trierweiller confining Francois Hollande to her past and moving on –-Thanx! it has been an explosive moment, the Union Thing; now we prod alone further. But we still close. Very close! If such explosive successes as the Union of Scotland and England has been, does not guarantee a common future for diverse nations, what does? For … nations? If the Scots vote yes on Thursday and break my heart head, I will start divesting my emotions from the Unitary republic of Kenya. I will definitely feel intellectually compelled to investigate our other options. Why can't the Mombasa Republicans have their pwani if that is what they want: referendum then. [Kenya is currently a ramshackle Unitary state. Most African countries are. If such a long and successful Union like the United Kingdom, painstakingly built and glorious in her history to herself, is abandoned by one of its core constituent parts that contributed to that heroic achievement –-Rule the Waves Brittania Rule the waves! the implication to me will be these colonially concoted and poorly-run countries of Africa with their ethnic insanity are going nowhere but to hell!] If you give folks a free choice in a referendum, may be quick time they will bolt from the Union like Eritrea did, like South Sudan did, and then subdivide further! Just imagining things about it makes me already depressed. And Friday is not yet here! –-Pray for me, poor soul! May be I am on my last blogging legs! And to imagine it is Scotland rather than Scotch/chang'aa that did me in! Fcuck! Thoo, aywagra kenda ka pod angima. --I will try to be back!
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Sept 17, 2014 21:05:41 GMT 3
SAVING THE UNION, FOR HIRELING TRAITOR'S WAGES! DESPERATE TIMES REQUIRE DESPERATE MEASURESThe woodwork cracked open and out tumbled the fattest of them all –-the retired Unionist worm Gordon Brown. This Scot is the former one-term British prime minister. He replaced Tony Blair after having been his long-serving Chancellor of the Exchequer. That is the eccentric British name for minister of finance. Gordon Brown had not been seen much, neither soap-boxing nor canvassing on the streets of his home state. The air-conditioned studios of the broadcast media were more of his pulpit, to preach the virtues of the Union while spewing alarm and discord, predicting the eventual doom of Scotland should the Yes win, and independence be declared. And the BBC, later to be busted as nothing but a Unionist mouthpiece, had given his ilk all the airtime they needed to monger the fear, before a semblance of shame clouded the national broadcaster's brazen partiality. The Beeb, always fondly masquerading as the epitome of objectivity while a bastion of the establishment, was called out and forced to mind her wretched reputation if any. demonstration outside the BBC's Glasgow headquarters, after the social media revealed that Nick Robinson had misrepresented Alex Salmond in a report. There was this last poll as the campaign entered the final stretch, and it gave the Yes a narrow lead, undecided voters evenly split. All sirens across Unionphilia went red. Prime Minister David Cameron abandoned 'Question Time' at Westminster –-a peak fixture in parliamentary business, cleared his agenda of everything else and headed North, to pacify the wild Scots. And many gifts did he carry to entreaty them continue with the United Kingdom. But even before he left London, the omens were not good. The Scottish flag which had been hung with much propagandistic pomp atop No 10 Downing Street, the Prime Ministers Official residence, drooled and fell flat like some dispirited co-ck, –-to the amusement of mockingly scandalised passers-by. As the Prime Minister came back to London, the Yes surged more ahead. His intervention had had the opposite effect. It was time for all union guns to blaze. The biggest companies in Scotland –-even the { )public-owned!!} Royal Scotland bank, declared they would quit Scotland and head for England if Yes won. The EU declared there would be no automatic entry into the Union for Scotland, but like some third class East European nation, or non-white Turkey, she would be kept biting her nails in the waiting room as the gods in Brussels went through the books and other secret data. American banks holding UK debt, too chimed in to say they would call in Scottish interest/portions the morning after! (the legal basis of this in international finance is unknown! But what the heck, Law? anyone know where Libya's fortune which Gaddafi banked in Western banks :-Xis?) All in all, The Lords of the World and Keepers of Futures were making it planely clear to Scotland, that Independence would be a very very dangerous and risky, if not ourightly foolish option. Freedom is bad for you!Nevertheless the young have remained unconvinced. For one they do not want to serve in endless wars abroad for all glory. And closer to their hearts, they were looking at the Tory/Labour establishment in far-away London ganging up to disband the vital NHS –- National Health Service, and the over €30,000 study-debt which graduates carry as hunchback as they enter an uncertain labour market, and thinking, better Scotland as no world power but free university tuition, and a good health insurance scheme. Scandinavia style. It is something few anglo-saxon Thatcherite economists understand when they denounce the Scandinavian model of NANNY states where tax rates go as high as 45% yet the population acquiesce. Three reasons to ponder: 1. Cheap but highly competitive education, both technical and theoretical. 2. Comprehensive health insurance (see how Obama can not make any headway with his proposed one for the USA. Something impossible to explain to Continental EUs, who see health insurance like car insurance. An ABC universally compulsory institute. Like buying a car automatically comes with road insurance, so does a baby born get presented with his/her medical cover, and a future tax-bill of course!) 3. Affordable housing as a right. You can be a trillionare, but you are not going to live in a 40 bedroom house in Berlin while bus-drivers live in one room-hovels with their families. The space must be shared in an economic polity. The city needs everybody relatively contented to function, toilet cleaners too for instance. 4. There is guarantee of thrift with the collected taxes. No Greek, Ukrainian, or Italian Mafioso-type state looting. NB: Most countries collect taxes only for a small elite to corrupt it away. Parasitically. Then you better keep all your money and pay least taxes, for you are then being milked dry, bled to death. NB: Kenyans, Nigerians, Ghanians, would know what I am talking about, given how much their Mpigs take away as a % of their GDP, doing naught in return.But to go back to our story, Cameron's failure to stem the Yes tide, led to all manner of creatures crawling out of the woodwork. The knight Gordon Brown strode the Scottish campaign landscape as if he were a Hun called Attila, or a Hannibal whose mere mention of name, would roll back an endless column of Roman armour. Coupled with the concerted scaremongering from all quarters of the world, the Scottish voter has reported an intimidation index, and the No, Unionists, are now ahead in three out of four polls. Yes, all the old boys from quaint Scottish schools who went new labour and made it big in the Blair-Brown years –-like Alistair Darling, have been forced to debate like they never did before. Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling Mr Darling was one of Labour's survivors, in Cabinet under both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown Brown of course is famous for having set the bank of England free, to determine interest rates far from the prying eyes of the treasury. In this he is the unwitting architect of the LIBOR scandal, and the godfather of the banking crisis. Freed from political control became freed from responsibility and accountability. –--The royal bank of Scotland now threatening to quit Scotland on a yes vote, was of course 100% bailed out by the very same taxpayers she now threatens to abandon!A footnote on the Libor scandal is important in global finance: Now, take a read at the following article, and remember how Obama and Romney agreed China was playing games with its currency and needed to be disciplined. blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/10/15/giant-foreign-currency-purchases-show-china-still-manipulating-yuan/ Okay read on. But I always reckoned I could figure it out without Harvard economics cum laude. –- China knew the LIBOR, the determinate rate in World Finance was RIGGED, fixed and SLANTED. A Sham value. Chinese econometrists therefore needed to factor in a CORRECTION.Very sensible if you are dealing with skewed variables, especially meant to RIP YOU OFF. But of course it is in the nature of hegemonic World Capital to demand nations lie down, offer their necks and accept them ripped. China refused, and Obama and Romney agreed she had to be forced, to accept being ripped, one way or another. But I will let Amigo Mank serve how that scenario is couched in top-range Harvard econometric theory! So it is with Scotland! The Scots can not be allowed to refuse to lie down and get ripped. They must stay in the Union. And being a small country, they just have to thrown in the towel. Unless they really want the heroism of pioneers. After all, Scotland is the home of David Hume and Adam Smith!Here is one billed as Scotland's best loved Poet. www.robertburns.org/works/344.shtml Such A Parcel Of Rogues In A Nation 1791 Poem Fareweel to a' our Scottish fame, Fareweel our ancient glory; Fareweel ev'n to the Scottish name, Sae fam'd in martial story. Now Sark rins over Solway sands, An' Tweed rins to the ocean, To mark where England's province stands- Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!
What force or guile could not subdue, Thro' many warlike ages, Is wrought now by a coward few, For hireling traitor's wages. The English stell we could disdain, Secure in valour's station; But English gold has been our bane- Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!
O would, or I had seen the day That Treason thus could sell us, My auld grey head had lien in clay, Wi' Bruce and loyal Wallace! But pith and power, till my last hour, I'll mak this declaration; We're bought and sold for English gold- Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Feb 16, 2015 20:27:44 GMT 3
I have forgotten what used to be the bone of contention in banking which linked the sinful word usury to it, and which makes some Islamic banks call themselves 'halal' as a quality mark, but I will check it out. But I know that 'handling stolen property' is a sin, a criminal offence, just like shielding criminals. So, when money is looted from poor African folks, and a bank does its best to aid the dictator to hide it and launder it, I do not call that banking. I know what it is and what those CEO's are. Scumbags. And a scumbag even if he is a lord, is still a piece of sh!t. www.theguardian.com/business/2015/feb/08/hsbc-files-expose-swiss-bank-clients-dodge-taxes-hide-millionsLord Stephen Green, the tickish english scumbug who, as CEO of the HSBC, aided African dictators and their cronies to siphon off billions from their impoverised masses, was knighted by David Cameron on behalf of the British establishment. Rona Fairhead, mid-wife to the financial debauchery at HSBC where, at the height of the sinful pillage of African peoples, she was the chair of the audit committee, was lauded by the British establishment too, to chair the BBC Trust. Apparently this accomplice to tax evasion who prostituted her mandate to illicit finance is the most trustworthy person the BBC could find for its Trust Fund! Rona Fairhead continues to juggle a role at HSBC with her BBC Trust duties, currently serving as chair of the bank’s North American division
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Feb 17, 2015 6:58:19 GMT 3
Jakaswanga, what was this war criminal doing in Kenya recently?
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Feb 17, 2015 12:23:27 GMT 3
Jakaswanga, what was this war criminal doing in Kenya recently? Hahaha! B6k! What cheek! Ever heard of what birds of the same feathers do? Together for instance? They are made mates! And may be its bed time! Where is Njakip? He forgot to tell us one of the reasons the USA and the UK described Palestinian entry into the ICC as unhelpful, was because, in blowback, if Bibi is indicted over Gaza, then the door is open for Blair over Iraq, and the Buck stops in DC!
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Feb 17, 2015 23:21:33 GMT 3
Jakaswanga, what was this war criminal doing in Kenya recently? Hahaha! B6k! What cheek! Ever heard of what birds of the same feathers do? Together for instance? They are made mates! And may be its bed time! Where is Njakip? He forgot to tell us one of the reasons the USA and the UK described Palestinian entry into the ICC as unhelpful, was because, in blowback, if Bibi is indicted over Gaza, then the door is open for Blair over Iraq, and the Buck stops in DC! Birds of a feather? If the words of the late Robin Cook a former UK foreign minister are anything to go by I beg to differ. He once said, without batting a scaly eyelid, that the ICC was ‘not a court set up to bring to book prime ministers of the United Kingdom or presidents of the United States.’ So clearly he believed that his former boss who walked in the corridors of Harambee House not more than 72 hours ago plays in a very different league than others you may be alluding to...
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Feb 23, 2015 14:58:12 GMT 3
Apparently HSBC bank, the British second largest banking racket in the world, is quite a Spender in newspaper advertising. So the Telegraph, a would be reputable paper, decided to cheat her readers instead, rather than tell the true tale of the criminal practices of the bank.
Yes, that is business. When you are owned, you do not bite the feeding hand. Pride goes before a fall. Fleet street is no longer what it was! Now just a den of who-res!
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Feb 24, 2015 12:31:16 GMT 3
Apparently HSBC bank, the British second largest banking racket in the world, is quite a Spender in newspaper advertising. So the Telegraph, a would be reputable paper, decided to cheat her readers instead, rather than tell the true tale of the criminal practices of the bank. Yes, that is business. When you are owned, you do not bite the feeding hand. Pride goes before a fall. Fleet street is no longer what it was! Now just a den of who-res! more chips falling into place. The Barclay brothers who own the Telegraph, owes the HSBC bank more than £240m! A very strong argument for compromising the credibility of their hobby, the telegraph.
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Feb 24, 2015 14:51:47 GMT 3
Apparently HSBC bank, the British second largest banking racket in the world, is quite a Spender in newspaper advertising. So the Telegraph, a would be reputable paper, decided to cheat her readers instead, rather than tell the true tale of the criminal practices of the bank. Yes, that is business. When you are owned, you do not bite the feeding hand. Pride goes before a fall. Fleet street is no longer what it was! Now just a den of who-res! more chips falling into place. The Barclay brothers who own the Telegraph, owes the HSBC bank more than £240m! A very strong argument for compromising the credibility of their hobby, the telegraph. I wonder how its done in Kenya nowadays. There were days of open then self censorship for editors, yet I recall adverts was one of the ways used to bend the weekly review which, under Hillary Ng'weno, had become an irritant to power. In Colombia at the height of the drug barons power, I understand they neither bought nor intimidated journalists. They just stated the fact: if you write what annoys us, you die! And so Pablo Escobar and his Medellin cartel wrote the law. Candidate for president and leader of the liberal party, to which Escobar belonged, rebelled against this. The former journalist was leading in the polls when the drug cartels teamed to murder him. His name? Luis Carlos Galan. Interesting detail: Escobar said, it was because he swore to extradit us to the USA. Such a Yankee dog has no business leading a great nation like Colombia. We are patriots! The late drug Baron grinned. No easy thing being a truthful newspaperman!
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Feb 24, 2015 18:34:59 GMT 3
rt.com/uk/234663-ex-mps-deny-wrongdoing/ Moonlighting, peddling access to key decision makers! and pocketing the remunerations without paying tax! No nation can now wag a moral finger at another! truly a period of darkness!
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Feb 25, 2015 12:32:18 GMT 3
Hahaha! B6k! What cheek! Ever heard of what birds of the same feathers do? Together for instance? They are made mates! And may be its bed time! Where is Njakip? He forgot to tell us one of the reasons the USA and the UK described Palestinian entry into the ICC as unhelpful, was because, in blowback, if Bibi is indicted over Gaza, then the door is open for Blair over Iraq, and the Buck stops in DC! Birds of a feather? If the words of the late Robin Cook a former UK foreign minister are anything to go by I beg to differ. He once said, without batting a scaly eyelid, that the ICC was ‘not a court set up to bring to book prime ministers of the United Kingdom or presidents of the United States.’ So clearly he believed that his former boss who walked in the corridors of Harambee House not more than 72 hours ago plays in a very different league than others you may be alluding to... b6k, this must have been a later Cook! When he was fresh n idealistic new foreign secretary, Robin Cook talked of a need for a Moral foreign policy for Britain! Haha! Something obviously happened to his mind! What?
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Feb 28, 2015 0:45:35 GMT 3
Birds of a feather? If the words of the late Robin Cook a former UK foreign minister are anything to go by I beg to differ. He once said, without batting a scaly eyelid, that the ICC was ‘not a court set up to bring to book prime ministers of the United Kingdom or presidents of the United States.’ So clearly he believed that his former boss who walked in the corridors of Harambee House not more than 72 hours ago plays in a very different league than others you may be alluding to... b6k, this must have been a later Cook! When he was fresh n idealistic new foreign secretary, Robin Cook talked of a need for a Moral foreign policy for Britain! Haha! Something obviously happened to his mind! What? The Brits like the Yanks don't do morals. They only believe in the national interest. It's good to see they too are human & can succumb to the temptation of the cookie jar or chicken spinning on the rotisserie... Speaking of the Yanks (and morals or lack thereof) I was amused to learn that they decided (HSBC Chairman) Gulliver's troubles are not big enough to have them close Britain's biggest bank because it's too big to fail or jail. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/12/hsbc-prosecution-fine-money-launderingYet another case of do as we say, not as we do when it comes to Mwafrika...
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Mar 10, 2015 23:46:50 GMT 3
Jakaswanga, what was this war criminal doing in Kenya recently? It has now been revealed! he is going to cost us quite a pile, this fake Tony. www.nation.co.ke/news/politics/Blair-lands-deal-for-key-Jubilee-projects/-/1064/2646572/-/wo2ynt/-/index.html At that rate, let us try to investigate if Mr. Kenyatta has done his homework and is spending Wanjiku's money on value, and getting the same for it. WHAT DO THE PEOPLE OF BRITAIN HAVE TO SAY ABOUT TONY BLAIR?www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/27/nick-cohen-tony-blair-kazakhstan The son of Jomo walks proudly with Tony Blair, the damaged goods from Britain. At a glance it is a triumphant march, the former ICC indictee now acquitted and, as His Excellency, employing as his houseboy the former Prime Minister of Great Britain. Not only did the UK jail UK's father for a decade at Maralal or Kapenguria in the late fifties, but when UK announced his candidature for the top office in Kenya a few years ago, Great Britain was one of the countries which threatened a boycott on account of his ICC woes. Now the former Prime Minister of that same Great Britain stretches out his craven hand for a handout from a would-be Kenyan villain, Ocampo speaking. But this propaganda stunt which so fondles Muigai's ego, is a sham. Pyrrhic. Why? Blair I said, is damaged goods. In his own country they recognise he is a mutant, a moral sell-out and a disgrace to the name of Britain. He is a fallen man, a shame
quarantined if not banished from the UK. ROBERT FISK ON BLAIR ROBERT FISK DISECTS, SKINS TONY BLAIR ALIVE. Now this man Fisk needs a parental advisory ---for those used to the scrawls of 8-4-4 = 0 journos. Robert Fisk of the independent is acerbic but cordial, utterly ruthless but charming. And he is cold-bloodedly witty. In the following piece , the veteran middle east correspondent for the Independent takes the former New Labour prime minister of the UK, now Lord Tony Blair, out of the manger into the abattoir. There, ritually, Robert the Brute Fisk disembowels Tony, pugnaciously chops Blair up, delightfully saws his bones in neat packs, then grinds him slowly as if his mind were some huge masticating jaw of a monstrous machine, like a tunnel borer that chews underground pristine rock. Fisk is a Great White, and hapless Tony Blair has surfed into his cruel jaws. It is a bloody sight, what remains of Tony, but a must see accident zone. It compels our morbid propensity to awe at horror. This man Fisk, if he were to write such a piece about Paul Kagame, his wife would already be contemplating her choices for the best widow-warmer in the line-up of burial guests. www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/robert-fisk-if-only-tony-blair-could-grasp-the-truth-about-field-marshal-sisi-9097378.html So this is the kind of conquest the son of Jomo proudly displays in Nairobi!? My Excellency President, you know you --or your advisors-- really make a silly fcuck of you! A disgrace to common sense. People like Blair are people like mALCOM Rifkind and Jack Straw ---expelled from their parties, expelled from the establishments of the nations they once led. These are fallen angels not worth polluting the Kenyan state House with. Omera wuod Kenyatta, ere wiyi? (Fire the scum and find somebody better: An American like Wolfowitz who once led the World Bank! If you must have a white trophy!)
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Aug 8, 2015 7:48:49 GMT 3
JEREMY CORBYN vs THE BLAIRITES $ THE ESTABLISHMENTGenuine is extreme, they say. Being true to ones self is political oblivion, definitely electoral suicide, goes the wisdom; they say, that the constructed public image or media persona casted by imagesmiths and projected by spindoctors, is the real deal; that virtual reality, the Westminster bubble, is the political reality of Britain. Well, that vision has been receiving some drubbing of late, sending the mandarins of the labour party into a frenzied tailspin. They had changed the leadership election rules to allow the participation of the grassroots party, and when you allow the hoi-polloi into an open process, and they are motivated enough to participate, the result is easily beyond establishment control: that is why most places elections are rigged: the people bring in a choice the establishment cannot live with. The anti-establishment choice of a mass is now rocking the Labour Party of Britain. This elite, this depersonalised PR-Frankestein grotesks of whom Tony Blair was the peak, increasingly are reaching their sell by date if the people are given a real choice to make. Authenticity is still a recognised gem by the people that is. And so the story of Jeremy Corbyn. I have been much engaged with home affairs the past weeks. That is because my famous tribesman Barrack H. Obama was visiting, and, conforming to his fame and exalted position as POTUS, in effect the reigning world monarch, courtesy of America's dwindling but still undisputed hegemony, we kinsmen were trying to make the historical home presentable. Indeed perhaps in foolhardy hope, we, as the Jokanyarnam tribal collective, were subconsciously pining a bit of his super stardom would rub onto our local hero who, of late, has been a tard too much of a fade. And all thanks to his stand on corruption which has been as hypocritical as that of the national incumbent. Over there at Siaya, the usurper Cornel Rasanga went on a spending binge to organise some wasteful extravaganza, thereby confirming Gem Jakoyo Midiwo's worst fears, that his cousin is a lost cause, mostly nothing but a Mount Kenya thieving clone. In our capital metropole Kisumu, home of His Exorbitance Jack Ranguma and her Obesity Ruth Akinyi, we busied ourselves preparing a long list of begging priorities to push before the nose of our Great Americanised brother. So occupied, I failed to notice one of the most comical episodes to hit Great Britain, post the Scottish referendum, post the subsequent defeat of Labour's Ed Milliband at the hands of the conservatives. This passing cloud of a leader was, media lies aside, a dyed in the wool Blairite, but foolhardy spindoctoring insisted on calling him Red Ed. The electorate read him fake, and voted in the real Blairite, Dave Tory Cameron. The morning after, Ed Milliband resigned, or, as they used to say, fell on his sword to save his honour. The Labour Party of Britian went in search of a leader. It was expected to be a blairite homerun. Where else would there be to run to? Yesterday an old friend of mine wrote me a long e-mail from Great Britain. He asked me if I ever heard of a Mr. Jeremy Corbyn of Islington, London. I lied I hadn't, so that he could come on me like I were a bushboy with a thicket of a head. (I had really condescended on him after the results of the Scottish referendum had shocked his Unionist heart. I had told him Westminister is no longer the Mecca of World Parliaments, but an incestuous English village with an increasingly retarding pool of political variation, --an over recycled species on the verge of an intellectual implosion; and so it came to pass that they believed their own nonsense about Scotland being an inseparable part of the Kingdom forever!). That left his mixed English genes fuming. Now he kind of bombshelled me, so I will do a hit on the rise Jeremy Corbyn, from a zero rate at the bookies to a surprise topper. First. Good Journalism. Now, a bit of intelligent but intimidated journalism That is the one I love best. The question - on 'free college education'-- itself has BEEN UNTHINKABLE! And UNASKABLE IN OPINION SURVEYS! NOW, it might be appropriate to split hairs and ask: unthinkable to who!? Note the following line from the TELEGRAPH/INDEPENDENT: ' 49% backed Ed Milliband's pledge to cut tuition fees
.. WHICH TELLS us Mr. Corbyn's policy must have public backing!'It is good deduction, logically sound, conclusively tenable. But if you were an above average newspaper, boasting a cutting edge editorial room, does not this look like an important scoop, worth further investigations, ie GOING OUT TO POLL what ACTUAL % of the electorate or population rallies to this logical deduction? How faulty was the hypothesis which maintained that this policy was so repugnantly radical, that it was TABOO, useless to even to formulate a question about it? (NO to bailing out banks, yes to free tuition!?) Unthinkable!? Undoable? One of the reasons young Scots so massively voted for Independence (or secession from the Union) is exactly the question of SCHOOL FEES, or better said, UNIVERSITY TUITION. The young Scots would prefer to give up their expensive subscription to (the Trident?) NUCLEAR DETERRENT, and have the money used instead for yes, you guessed it, FREE college EDUCATION! That is clearly unthinkable in London. But common sense in Glasgow. So wither the Union. But what does a renowned paper from London say: the policy is so radical it is unthinkable! and question has been unaskable! methinks they have a very good reason not to commission such a poll in England. It would turn out not to be too radical for the peoples, it would be pure common sense like Up North in Whiskeyland! How many young Britons really think, or believe, their Nuclear arsenal is a deterrent!? (another unthinkable question?) To paraphrase Tony Blair, if they think Britain does not need a nuclear arsenal, they should have a brain transplant! But more likely is that the people are going to have an elite transplant or replacement! WHAT ARE OPINION POLLS WORTH? NB: How do opinion polls work? In Scotland they predicted a neck and neck between Yes and No. The establishment wanted a No, the result was an overwhelming Yes. Why did the pollsters get it so wrong? Jeremy Corbyn was considered a lunatic fringe, only proposed as an amusement to fire up the campaign. Then he shot up to the top as the public favourite immediately, uniting the establishment in a fury of condemnation and denunciation. Why such a misreading of public mood by the establishment? In Greece referendum, again the polls said it was neck and neck between Yes and No. No went 60% in the result. Obvioulsy there something wrong with polling. Unless of course, polling is a science, but like the results of many elections in the third world, those announcing the results are, as Joseph Stalin once said, really what counts! We have to ask the questions. Simple questions. Are polls routinely rigged, even in the mother of parliamentary democracy, the United Kingdom. Now that, would really be something utterly rotten. But very human! www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/08/jeremy-corbyn-labour-leadership-humble-demonised-dinosaur-modern-message
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Oct 21, 2015 19:20:01 GMT 3
OF CORE BRITISH VALUES IN HER MAJESTY'S DIPLOMATIC SERVICEHere is, in passing, a random event from Nairobi. But we will give it content. Bear with us. He will succeed christian turner! you can not make that name up! So what will be the brief of this new British kid in town. Usual ---non missionaric-- stuff I guess ---leaving spying to the military attache and his 'stills'; hosting Kenyan politicians to avail them to British spymasters for recruitment or profiling (for blackmail or bribery); drinking champagne or sipping tea and watching legs of whatever sex he likes, and, last but not least, soothing tempers by saying sweet nothings whenever tension between the two 'sisterly' countries threatens to explode into an ugly altercation, due to British arrogance misunderstood British humour. But whatever his brief may be, Nic Hailey can not climb any moral pedestal, there to harangue anybody in Nairobi about human rights and democracy. He can not even twitch his red nose at the war-crimes indictee and vice president William Ruto.Why? The leaked diplomatic cables which detail the horse-trading which the United Kingdom engaged in at the United Nations in New York, to make sure Saudi Arabia was elected prefect of international human rights! But that was then two years ago. The juice in the deal has ripened and here is the vintage. Now the content I promised . Instead of antagonising ICC -kangaroo chair Eboe-Osuji in a public spat, Uhuru Kenyatta has better ways of helping William Ruto if he means to. (The passionate but stupid way in which the son of Jomo lambasted the Head Judge on Nairobi's Heroes day, 20-10-2015, hurts more than helps Ruto's neck in the hangman's noose!) Uhuru, if his mind is to help his deputy Ruto, is better off exploring a deal with the totally immoral David Cameron and his rotten diplomatic corps. Britain, as America's lieutenant and China's best friend in the NATO ---I have been watching Xi Jin's and David C's theatrics in London this 21st day of October, and I am convinced Britain is the key to Ruto's release. Uhuru just has to find the price London will take. So, shut up Mr. President in public, and dodeals in the dark with those who move the wheels of international politics. Those who can hoist Saudi Arabia to head World Human Rights at the United Nations, and preach democracy at the top of their voices without blinking. Nice detail is this: David Cameron skull-fwacked a dead pig in his cannabis-ridden days at Oxford. An old Etonian, he was being initiated into the Piers Gaveston society, a meaner version of the notorious bullingdon societet. Conservative peer and multimillionaire Lord Ashcroft reported the claims in his 'unauthorised biography' of Mr Cameron. NB: I mean DC -for David Cameron looks to me to be more approachable for rotten deals (like would be required to scuttle the ICC) than his would be nemesis JC. Jesus Christ for Jeremy Corbin. Truth be said, an earthly waragi swiggler like yours truly is more comfortable in the company of ghanja indulgents (UK) and dead skull-fukcers, DC. William Ruto is a born-again Christian. Such piety is a dangerous thing in a head of state. It is a mental cage. An opium addict at the most, a superstitious mind at the least! (while it will be a deal, a horsetrade, to relieve him of his ICC woes, he will interpret it as divine deliverance! A work of God!). The new British ambassador to Kenya may still have to educate a future president after all! cheers amigos!
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Jun 7, 2017 20:14:51 GMT 3
LONDON CALLING JEREMY CORBYNI hope there are many attentive Kenyans in the UK. Watching the elections. Incumbent PM Teresa May is a grotesque par Excellency. Panicked witless and unhinged by dwindling fortunes at the polls, she has declared she will do away with human rights legislation where they get in the way of the fight against terrorism. And that is really everywhere! How new is this!? (this authoritarian buffoonery!) What kind of policy, pray tell, did the British security forces pursue in Northern Ireland and beyond, in the face of militant Irish nationalism, and most recently, the variant spearheaded by the IRA in Northern Ireland? Was it not a shoot-to-kill, targeted eliminations, fabricated evidence for long convictions, and just about every extra-judicial grime!? And O, at the end of the 'troubles' and the drawn-out process of negotiations, was that Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness being celebrated at no 10 Downing Street as peace-makers!? And then, those of us born in former British colonies and having some historical knowledge, may we not be provoked to lots of grins, listening to Teresa May throwing out the Geneva Conventions ala Dubya and Cheney! Why grins? For starters, James Bond can now be licensed to KILL AT HOME, and what is more, hunt and kill fellow Britons around British urbans slums, albeit evil Arab Muslims. 2Nd: MI5&6 personnel were reported 'observers' around the CIA black spots around the globe where the waterboardings, anal rehydrations, wall checks and what have you were being perfected on Muslim terrorist suspects. Now they can gear to exercise those skills at home without stiff upper lips, and on their fellow citizens, albeit Arab and Muslim! See there. Now, come to think of it. In their imperial fight against national liberation movements like the Mau Mau of Kenya, ATROCITY was always the name of the game for the Brits. The Boers of South Africa have particularly nasty names for the British! --whom they say invented the concentration camp for whites! It is not that I think Teresa May is recidivist, no, she is just promising to introduce at home in the 22nd century, the atrocities empire used to commit far from home! No longer can the contradictions stay exported. The battle abroad, is the battle at home.Some lighter stuff from the colonial library include: pass laws (some areas of London will be no-go for Arabs); arbitrary arrests of Arabs (anti loitering and vagrancy laws!); indefinite detention ex harbeas corpus (suspect Arabs need not make court appearances). --what Teresa May means, we ex-colonials all know. Like the Negroes of America and their civil rights have always been less enshrined! A sordid future for the once Great Britain. Little England sure deserves her sordid Teresa. May they elect her tomorrow! But even Big Guns can jam! freak! DOUBT AND THE PROSPECT OF A HUNG PARLIAMENT But Britain does not accept sordid Teresa's that easy. The lady has aroused the Doubting Tom in the body of the electorate. She has squandered a 20-point lead, and the unlikely Prime Minister Jeremy Corbyn still has a fighting chance. Howbeit this possibility has sent the establishment journalists hysterical with venom. As May's lead shrunk, they have dedicated whole and half of the daily papers to the vilification of Jeremy Corbyn. Journalism has become the shame of Britain. Even the would-be high-brow political journalism of broad-sheets have blown cover. But their ubiquitous and rabid anti Corbynism has achieved an interesting blowback. Young Britons consider even the BBC just another tabloid. And not because of such stuff The scottish referendum was a last straw. www.dca.org.uk/whats-on/event/london-calling-bbc-bias-during-the-2014-scottish-independence-referendum www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-polls-snap-general-election-2017-live-poll-under-40s-young-people-older-winning-a7702616.html
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Jun 10, 2017 15:03:23 GMT 3
THE JEREMY CORBYN SCARE, A WARNING SHOT? Insulated in their bubble of illusions, the anti-Corbyn ranks dismissed the man and egged the woman on. They admonished Teresa Jeremy was a godsend and she would walk over him with a landslide, on the way to a super majority in the House of Commons. All the Big Guns of punditry agreed: Corbyn was labour's coffin, an electoral harakiri. Go Teresa, go for it girl, the nation loves you! burry him alive! he is asking for it!However, as the campaigns wore on, much dangerous did the British establishment see the ratings of their Tory preference slide in the opinion polls. Then, as the D-Day neared, the gap narrowed enough as to suggest there was, within the margins of error, either possibility of Tory May or Red Corbyn at No. 10. Howbeit the establishment and their mouthpieces entered into a pyranha mode, tearing the red Labour leader to the bone in a last-ditch attempt to force national love upon the ugly girl. Some of them like Old David Dimbleby of the BBC, a veteran of election night broadcasts, were shamed enough into becrying the bias. But it looked a vain glorious attempt to exonerate the BBC whose very own sexy star, Laura Kuenssberg, had an embarrassing call with a now disbanded media (integrity) watchdog. So what is the Big Deal really? Why would the British electorate succumb to the charms of such an establishment hate figure? Is it an isolated case in the lonely Island nation, or is it a general trend across Europe, perhaps a crisis in confidence, seeing that even the USA had this outsider Donald Trump gatecrush the orchestrated coronation of either a scion of the Bush or Clinton dynasty?But that was Putin did it, wasn't it!? ---he, Comely!? Corbyn's electoral manifesto is worth a deep-thought moment of contemplation. He actually offered a break from the neo-Thatcherite consensus. Tony Blair's labour had been a left masquerade of that. Those who thought of themselves as readers for the people dismissed the manifesto as a SANTA CLAUS SHOW for idiots in a forgotten orphanage. Good for a day's entertainment then best entirely forgotten. But they hadn't reckoned these days of smart-gadgets, many people, young people, would bother to read for themselves, ponder for themselves and wonder, could it just be possible this was the deal they are waiting for? The other factor overlooked seemed to Corbyn's capacity to aggressively campaign for what he believed in, and even if no charisma, cut a convincing, likeable figure. He shocked the electorate by that convincing retinue of genuine persona, far from a PR-firm's concoction; and worse, his wheeling's and dealings raised yes as a possible answer to the question: can honest people go places in politics, and their nations along?It is an accepted cliche honest people have no business in many top modern careers ---politics, law, banking, law enforcement, war-making. That is modernity for you, moral depravity and consciental destitution, and in politics Machiavelli spells it out, the Goebbels doctrine rules, and a series of generational pundits support. Honesty and integrity are evolutionary ballast best evolved out for those with ambition. Otherwise you stay a retard, like Corbyn was suppose to be (and confirmed himself in the dominant narrative) when he launched his manifesto in Bradford. This is the kind of stuff people heard. SANTA CLAUS!? How does Santa Claus pay for his gifts!? That was suppose to be a ridiculing line! With great institutes of learning like Oxford and Cambridge, one would think there are any number of competing econometric models (algorithyms?) at hand to fill-out that sudoku a-la minute! But arrogance and orthodoxy can lead to such negligence as once forced the Church, for ages, to insist Galileo Galilei belonged to the dungeon! So Oxbridge stayed waxing mute in its Papal infallability! But there are pirates in the intellectual seas too! Corbyn in his red dungeon came up with a terrifying answer to the sudoku puzzle, the one of funding his santalike sugar daddy gifts showers!: REDISTRIBUTION OF THE SOCIAL WEALTH. ---Tax the super-rich more, erase the famous BONUSES, and don't go global war-mongering wasting away huge budgets abroad in subterfuge wars of looting resources from rebellious tribes. Terrible blowbacks on the streets of London as collateral damage. And yes, the high tax on the super rich soon got wings as public imagination connected it to folklore: 'THE ROBIN HOOD TAX!' and behold, lots of people like that 'misnomer', Robin Hood T.! More T-shirts please! But to the status quo, that is of course anathema -- upsetting property relations. Corbyn making himself an outlaw! And pointing to an Achilles heel too: international relations ----The fundamental question is then asked, repeated by a man who means it: Is a 'moral foreign policy' (to echo the late --then widely ridiculed minister of foreign affairs----Robin Cooke) compatible with Britain's prosperity? Aren't neo-colonies (and their subservient, satellite political economies) vital to Great Britain as it is? Is it not of fundamental importance, a matter of existential pre-conditions, that Great Britain as we know it, continue sucking up to medieval monarchies in the middle east, horrid Arab dictators, for energy profits and arms sales, all to the glory of the home treasury? I guess this is repeat of the argument during decolonisation. Great good people like Winston Churchill fought the Nazi evil tirelessly to free Europe from tyranny, but when it came to the freedom of the people within British colonies, the enlightened european freedom lovers treated the brownies with the same murderous contempt Adolf Hitler treated Jews. --- Third Reich bad, British Reich good. SHASHI THAROOR, an era of darkness. (interesting argument going on between some Indian scholars and British historians about the colonial era in India!) SEE FOOTNOTE: CHURCHILL### A lot of powerful people were convinced Britain had to maintain hold of her colonies. Without these territories where capital was multiplied, natural resources monopolised and market segments guaranteed for finished products, these leading actors could only conceive of a diminished and second tier power Britain. Ending colonialism was doom, just like centuries earlier, tidings of ending slavery had been! They fought tooth and nail to maintain the old order until bankruptcy stared them in the face. But it turned out a double liberation I think, though not in the Fanonian sense. We got flag independence and colonialism became neo-colonialism. A modernisation. The Corbyn upsurge is a shot across the bow of the UK status quo I think. Jeremy Corbyn hints at a neo-colonialism having become an expensive drag and moral drain on Britain, that there is an imperative need it should evolve into something else; and too, he insists that something else, more moral, less predatory, is not to the detriment of Great Britain, quite on the contrary, for a better all inclusive Britain. It sounds more Messianic than Santa Claus gimmicks if you ask me! NB: From the position of companies like BAE, BP --and the City which is a mushroom on top of the rot of international finance, red Corbyn is more dangerous than the new Hitler, Putin! He is talking blasphemy! A moral foreign policy! How immoral! energydesk.greenpeace.org/2016/01/15/data-how-guns-and-oil-dominate-uk-saudi-arabia-relationship/ All politics are local! and pockets! And what a place for pockets, that oily middle east! That Anglo-Iranian bit has this sting in the tale ------- Mohammad Mosaddegh Now think of how tosses of triumphalist champagne clicked in London's Thame banks, and Houston and Fort Langley USA, when they successfully reversed Mosaddegh's modest reforms! A ghost haunts No 10 Downing Street, the ghost of Mohammad Saddegh!Next: MARRIED TO LUCRATIVE DEALS WITH MEDIEVAL RULERS?
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Jun 11, 2017 0:12:59 GMT 3
2. THOUGHTS ON THE CORBYN SCARE (OF AN ESTABLISHMENT MARRIED TO ARMS SALES TO MEDIEVAL RULERS) Sweet and lucrative, (the proceeds of Arabia) Find me a better deal (And I will sign divorce) (Give me a better deal and I quit the middle east)It is more correct to say the profits are addictive! To the British ruling class. They are hooked. Jeremy Corbyn suggesting a changed, progressive foreign policy may result lesser blowbacks in London, is like a rehab officer telling a street ho hooked on cocaine there is life after peddling arse for a shot! Nay, the rich pickings have made the profiteers who control the levers of power directly or by proxy, oblivious to the diminishing trend in returns. They continue to ignore the warnings and explain otherwise, the intermittent blowbacks at home. They are still pushing for ever more egregious wars of plunder abroad. Understandably so, because, at their wits end yet historically triumphalist, they are haunted by massive deficits, risky debt portfolios and ratios, volatile currencies, raw austerity and the chill of a restive population. Something must be done, and it is a crisis compounded by rising economic powers like China. These are changing the international balance. The Guardian, evolved into a Blairite, anti-Corbyn establishment machine, had an expose on the depraved contours of the UK arms trade. But how tip-toe they tell it! When the books balance! That is a perfect market! And man, don't you know the mathematical oddity of that divinity! -sustained simultaneous orgasm! Like walking on egg-shells they tell it! stay awake for the language of the Guardian! ''Many of the UK's biggest customers have 'Questionable' human records!'' Suppose you named the really big ones and fact-checked their human rights records! Doesn't the Guardian's choice of words become
well
. equally 'questionable', wherefore, were one a bull's eye poet of precision, the paper and her editorial board would, in Robert Burns like turn of phrase, be of a refracted glass of vision!Or Orwellian satire
like
. Words words words! But not a grain of truth therein! So empty has the once mighty Fleet Street become Journalists nothing but decrepit megaphones of ruling barons!Have the Saudis been (falsely) accused of targeting civilians in Yemen? or have they actually done so!? The Guardian leaves that one hanging! But the actual situation (over and) in Yemen can factually be appraised othersource, no!? documented!? Mere 'accusations', The Authoritative center-left Guardian reported! Corbyn hasn't been mincing words about these things. On the illegal Iraq war based upon false pretexts, -- WMD, he refused to outrule the prosecution of Britain's longest serving Labour premier Tony Blair!'We will drink your blood!' the remnant Blairite vampires still on his labour's frontbench squealed, then they went into the shadows to sharpen their fangs to emerge another day. The British electorate has just decided they should abide more time! Corbyn emerged victorious, except he lost the election. Teresa May won the election, except she has no majority!Damn the people! Damn the electorate! Faking sheep off message! nearly giving Holy Teresa a heart attack the morning after. This election was about a hard brexit, not scurrying after a Santa Claus sprinkling peremende!See footnote 2: France's Tony Blair, Emmanuel Macron, as slash-and-burn artist. (he will be using wide executive powers to ram through anti-labour laws!) FOOTNOTE: CHURCHILLEarlier on the running debate about the civilising impact of the British empire, Asian Chapter.
|
|