Post by jakaswanga on Jul 5, 2015 22:31:42 GMT 3
WILLIAM KIPCHIRCHIR SINGH'S FAKE ZEALOTRY AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY IN KENYA
It is called deflection. Switching attention elsewhere from that which is hurting, and for this Singh in particular, generating an even more emotional red herring to substitute for the hurting publicity of corruption. Channeling mass anger elsewhere. And here William Ruto is a fish in his waters. Cornered, with a businessman moved to court demanding he relinquish the stolen land on which the Weston Hotel is built, he is off to the pulpit to point fingers at well, a so-called cultural abomination which Obama is arriving to promote: homosexuality. This is stuff for, in Uhuru Kenyatta's weak lingo, stepping aside to allow investigations. But since when does anybody worth his salt take the son of Jomo seriously in these matters? And so he is stuck with his corrupt running-mate as a necessary component to the tyrany of numbers, and we are stuck with his thieving cabineet and bureaucrats, and he, his Excellency, is stuck with his impotence to mean anything to the land.
Kenyatta II can not table even a single sessional paper to define his epoch. The infrastructural upgrades around the country funded by China are of course already patented, that is if one remembers the GCG of Raila and his LOOK-EAST principal, Mwai Kibaki. Those without memory due to drink or worse ---like ideological lobotomy and historical amnesia--- will be excused for thinking these are Jubilee projects. One is always advised to be wary of too much taxing the mental faculties of the Kenyan ruling class. Mpigs we call them, right?
To which cult of animal fetish must one belong to worship hogs? Ukenya may be!
An expulsion order (to quit Kenya) at the adress of those who will support gay rights! fwaka is gone off his rocker! This is a God-fearing nation and we will be firm on what is right! Says the DP. Now, suppose one were to take him serious on that! It is right to be firm on corruption. Where would Ruto be if not behind bars!
And, dear reader, let me take you on a trip behind bars, and introduce you to the un-African, un-godly, unnatural things which, O God, Africans of all people succumb to and not apologetically!
We need an alternative jail system! O William Singh! to match your gay-free paradise!
THE KENYAN JAIL AS A SODOMISER'S PARADISE.
The penal code is sure. It penalises a man knowing another man.
www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/ILJ/upload/Finerty-final-version.pdf
Carnal knowledge is likely a euphemism for penetration. Object of penetration is likely to be legally understood as mmm. Wherefore finger, vibrator, dildo or medical enema, are discounted.
How about having carnal knowledge against the order of nature?
I will like to think the oral cavity is not (legally) defined as a ''carnal'' -istic, wherefore an orally intruding dick may be described as having or granting itself sexually explicit knowledge, but that knowledge is definitely not ''carnal''. Erotic and sexual, but no, not carnal.
Now replace the dick with a bar of chocolate and watch women and men deliciously at work, slurping and licking and pursing lips, and ask yourself how much the nutritious exercise is immune to an erotic or sexual charge!? And pro-African culture.
I come from the general area, geographically speaking, where the folklore canon of jurisprudence pantheons the likes of Argwings Kodhek, Ogendo Japuonj Okinde, and the likes SM Otieno, so I got it internalised the only reason you do not split hairs at law is because your brains fail you.
Then there is the day I realised the new great constitution could not be used to even pinpoint the date of the GENERAL ELECTION, starting from the last election date, -some will remember the August or December or March debate and when 5-year terms end or not!)-- I always suspected everything is up for grabs in our new constitution. Such inbuilt ambiguities have their advantages, especially on murky subjects like ''carnal knowledge against the orders of nature''.
Sodomy may be understood as illegal, but LBGT's are guaranteed their identity. In the same constitutional space. How they express this sexual identity without doing what they do -various (natural or not, Christian or not, African or not) forms of aided or unaided carnal knowledge, is, I suppose, a don't ask don't tell situation. Unless of course a police officer chances upon them in the act and can prove carnal has been known against nature! (one must not discount the imaginative, diverse and yet purely pro-nature ways of achieving carnal knowledge).
In in William the Talibhan Ruto's case, there is also the need to define which practices are to be legally sanctioned as Christian and African, and enshrined in the constitution. (Anal within heterosexual marriage may well be Christian but not African, and oral be African but anti-Christian).
Now, consider the homophobia of pedofile-ridden institutes like the Catholic priesthood, or the cultural invocations of animosity toward gays, fanned by subway-mouth-arseholed types like the this Singh who grabs public land and orders protesting pupils tear-gassed, and plot them against the actual Kenyan practice in penitentiary outbacks.
That is the nex post. Here below. First a comment.
It is called deflection. Switching attention elsewhere from that which is hurting, and for this Singh in particular, generating an even more emotional red herring to substitute for the hurting publicity of corruption. Channeling mass anger elsewhere. And here William Ruto is a fish in his waters. Cornered, with a businessman moved to court demanding he relinquish the stolen land on which the Weston Hotel is built, he is off to the pulpit to point fingers at well, a so-called cultural abomination which Obama is arriving to promote: homosexuality.
DP Ruto ordered to respond to Weston Hotel suit
July 4, 2015
THE High Court yesterday directed Deputy President William Ruto to file his response within 45 days on how he acquired the Weston Hotel land.
Sitting in Milimani, Justice John Mutungi ordered the DP, through Priority Limited, to file the response before businessman Jacob Juma, who is the petitioner, replies in 15 days.
Respondents are given 45 days to file their response while the petitioner is given 15 days to reply before the case goes to full hearing, the judge said.
Speaking during a TV interview, Ruto admitted to having shares at Priority.
The company has been named as the first respondent, with Monene Investment and Weston Hotel named second and third respondents respectively.
The Attorney General, National Land Commission, EACC and Kenya Civil Aviation Authority have also been named as respondents.
Juma is seeking the revocation of the hotels title deed, saying its land was set aside for the Directorate of Civil Aviation, now the Kenya Civil Aviation Authority.
In court documents, he says stores measuring 1.9 acres were initially at the site housing sensitive air navigation equipment and spares belonging to KCAA.
Juma says the grant issued to Priority and Monene by the Lands Commissioner breached public trust when he allotted the property on August 30, 2002.
He says KCAA intended to build its headquarters there before the change of ownership.
- See more at: www.the-star.co.ke/news/dp-ruto-ordered-respond-weston-hotel-suit#sthash.p0xoF4Dy.dpuf
July 4, 2015
THE High Court yesterday directed Deputy President William Ruto to file his response within 45 days on how he acquired the Weston Hotel land.
Sitting in Milimani, Justice John Mutungi ordered the DP, through Priority Limited, to file the response before businessman Jacob Juma, who is the petitioner, replies in 15 days.
Respondents are given 45 days to file their response while the petitioner is given 15 days to reply before the case goes to full hearing, the judge said.
Speaking during a TV interview, Ruto admitted to having shares at Priority.
The company has been named as the first respondent, with Monene Investment and Weston Hotel named second and third respondents respectively.
The Attorney General, National Land Commission, EACC and Kenya Civil Aviation Authority have also been named as respondents.
Juma is seeking the revocation of the hotels title deed, saying its land was set aside for the Directorate of Civil Aviation, now the Kenya Civil Aviation Authority.
In court documents, he says stores measuring 1.9 acres were initially at the site housing sensitive air navigation equipment and spares belonging to KCAA.
Juma says the grant issued to Priority and Monene by the Lands Commissioner breached public trust when he allotted the property on August 30, 2002.
He says KCAA intended to build its headquarters there before the change of ownership.
- See more at: www.the-star.co.ke/news/dp-ruto-ordered-respond-weston-hotel-suit#sthash.p0xoF4Dy.dpuf
Kenyatta II can not table even a single sessional paper to define his epoch. The infrastructural upgrades around the country funded by China are of course already patented, that is if one remembers the GCG of Raila and his LOOK-EAST principal, Mwai Kibaki. Those without memory due to drink or worse ---like ideological lobotomy and historical amnesia--- will be excused for thinking these are Jubilee projects. One is always advised to be wary of too much taxing the mental faculties of the Kenyan ruling class. Mpigs we call them, right?
To which cult of animal fetish must one belong to worship hogs? Ukenya may be!
DP William Ruto: homosexuals have no place in Kenya
By Geoffrey Mosoku Updated Sunday, July 5th 2015
Ruto scoffed at the United States (US) Supreme Court ruling that granted rights across American states for same sex marriages, saying the same will never be replicated locally The other day you heard that in America the court has ruled about homosexuality but in this country we will defend what is right and what our faith states, he said.
The DP said Kenya is a God fearing nation and will never recognise anyone pushing gay and lesbian rights, asking those who want to practice the vice to look for other countries. According to the Deputy President, an overwhelming majority are Christians whose faith only recognises marriage as a union between a man and a woman as ordained by God at creation. God did not create man and woman for a man to come and marry another man. We believe in God. This is a God-fearing nation and we will be firm on what is right, he said.
See also: US Supreme Court erred in legalising gay marriage Speaking at the AIC Ziwani church in
Nairobi, during Sunday service, Ruto who was accompanied by his wife Rachel and four MPs from Nairobi County, asked Kenyans to be ready to defend what they believe it and not accept foreign practices. We will fight for and defend our country and faith. Those who want to engage in those things can go to those countries and not ours, he added. Nominated Senator Beth Mugo, MPs Maina Kamanda (Starehe), Dennis Waweru (Dagorreti South), John Ndirangu (Embakasi Central) and Nairobi County Assembly Minority Leader Hashim Kamau accompanied the DP. Ruto becomes the senior most government official to hit out at the US court ruling, with his remarks coming only three weeks before US President Barack Obama arrives in Nairobi.
Read more at: www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000168074/dp-ruto-homosexuals-have-no-place-in-kenya
Read more at: www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000168074/dp-ruto-homosexuals-have-no-place-in-kenya
By Geoffrey Mosoku Updated Sunday, July 5th 2015
Ruto scoffed at the United States (US) Supreme Court ruling that granted rights across American states for same sex marriages, saying the same will never be replicated locally The other day you heard that in America the court has ruled about homosexuality but in this country we will defend what is right and what our faith states, he said.
The DP said Kenya is a God fearing nation and will never recognise anyone pushing gay and lesbian rights, asking those who want to practice the vice to look for other countries. According to the Deputy President, an overwhelming majority are Christians whose faith only recognises marriage as a union between a man and a woman as ordained by God at creation. God did not create man and woman for a man to come and marry another man. We believe in God. This is a God-fearing nation and we will be firm on what is right, he said.
See also: US Supreme Court erred in legalising gay marriage Speaking at the AIC Ziwani church in
Nairobi, during Sunday service, Ruto who was accompanied by his wife Rachel and four MPs from Nairobi County, asked Kenyans to be ready to defend what they believe it and not accept foreign practices. We will fight for and defend our country and faith. Those who want to engage in those things can go to those countries and not ours, he added. Nominated Senator Beth Mugo, MPs Maina Kamanda (Starehe), Dennis Waweru (Dagorreti South), John Ndirangu (Embakasi Central) and Nairobi County Assembly Minority Leader Hashim Kamau accompanied the DP. Ruto becomes the senior most government official to hit out at the US court ruling, with his remarks coming only three weeks before US President Barack Obama arrives in Nairobi.
Read more at: www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000168074/dp-ruto-homosexuals-have-no-place-in-kenya
Read more at: www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000168074/dp-ruto-homosexuals-have-no-place-in-kenya
And, dear reader, let me take you on a trip behind bars, and introduce you to the un-African, un-godly, unnatural things which, O God, Africans of all people succumb to and not apologetically!
We need an alternative jail system! O William Singh! to match your gay-free paradise!
THE KENYAN JAIL AS A SODOMISER'S PARADISE.
Exposed! Most Kenyan Male Prisoners have at least 6 to 7 male wives.
March 9, 2015
Homos3xuality in prisons is a very common phenomenon all over the world. However usually the
man will have only one wife. But for hardened prisoners in Kenya one wife is not enough and it is common for some of them to have six to seven male wives. It all depends on how much money a prisoner can raise. Apparently as soon as a new prisoner comes in a bidding war commences. The one who pays the most usually Kshs 800 or so and gets the new prisoner who is then assigned to their cell.
The horror of this practice does not end there. Kenyan prisons are overly crowded meaning that there is absolutely no privacy for the husband and his wives save for the darkness of the cell.
According to Human Rights Watch, 22 per cent of male inmates have been raped at least once during their incarceration.
An officer assigned to Industrial Area Remand Prison says it is a culture that prison authorities turn a blind eye to it.
When a new guy walks into a cell, the prisoners sometimes fight over him and the winner turns the new inmate into his wife
March 9, 2015
Homos3xuality in prisons is a very common phenomenon all over the world. However usually the
man will have only one wife. But for hardened prisoners in Kenya one wife is not enough and it is common for some of them to have six to seven male wives. It all depends on how much money a prisoner can raise. Apparently as soon as a new prisoner comes in a bidding war commences. The one who pays the most usually Kshs 800 or so and gets the new prisoner who is then assigned to their cell.
The horror of this practice does not end there. Kenyan prisons are overly crowded meaning that there is absolutely no privacy for the husband and his wives save for the darkness of the cell.
According to Human Rights Watch, 22 per cent of male inmates have been raped at least once during their incarceration.
An officer assigned to Industrial Area Remand Prison says it is a culture that prison authorities turn a blind eye to it.
When a new guy walks into a cell, the prisoners sometimes fight over him and the winner turns the new inmate into his wife
The penal code is sure. It penalises a man knowing another man.
www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/ILJ/upload/Finerty-final-version.pdf
Kenyas Penal Code criminalizes sodomy. Under this law, a person who
has carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature
or permits a male person to have carnal knowledge of him or her against the order of nature commits a felony, punishable on conviction by a fourteen-year prison term.[40] An attempt to commit an unnatural offense, also a crime, is , punishable on conviction by a seven-year prison term.[41
Carnal knowledge is likely a euphemism for penetration. Object of penetration is likely to be legally understood as mmm. Wherefore finger, vibrator, dildo or medical enema, are discounted.
How about having carnal knowledge against the order of nature?
I will like to think the oral cavity is not (legally) defined as a ''carnal'' -istic, wherefore an orally intruding dick may be described as having or granting itself sexually explicit knowledge, but that knowledge is definitely not ''carnal''. Erotic and sexual, but no, not carnal.
Now replace the dick with a bar of chocolate and watch women and men deliciously at work, slurping and licking and pursing lips, and ask yourself how much the nutritious exercise is immune to an erotic or sexual charge!? And pro-African culture.
I come from the general area, geographically speaking, where the folklore canon of jurisprudence pantheons the likes of Argwings Kodhek, Ogendo Japuonj Okinde, and the likes SM Otieno, so I got it internalised the only reason you do not split hairs at law is because your brains fail you.
Then there is the day I realised the new great constitution could not be used to even pinpoint the date of the GENERAL ELECTION, starting from the last election date, -some will remember the August or December or March debate and when 5-year terms end or not!)-- I always suspected everything is up for grabs in our new constitution. Such inbuilt ambiguities have their advantages, especially on murky subjects like ''carnal knowledge against the orders of nature''.
Sodomy may be understood as illegal, but LBGT's are guaranteed their identity. In the same constitutional space. How they express this sexual identity without doing what they do -various (natural or not, Christian or not, African or not) forms of aided or unaided carnal knowledge, is, I suppose, a don't ask don't tell situation. Unless of course a police officer chances upon them in the act and can prove carnal has been known against nature! (one must not discount the imaginative, diverse and yet purely pro-nature ways of achieving carnal knowledge).
In in William the Talibhan Ruto's case, there is also the need to define which practices are to be legally sanctioned as Christian and African, and enshrined in the constitution. (Anal within heterosexual marriage may well be Christian but not African, and oral be African but anti-Christian).
Now, consider the homophobia of pedofile-ridden institutes like the Catholic priesthood, or the cultural invocations of animosity toward gays, fanned by subway-mouth-arseholed types like the this Singh who grabs public land and orders protesting pupils tear-gassed, and plot them against the actual Kenyan practice in penitentiary outbacks.
That is the nex post. Here below. First a comment.