Post by omundustrong on Aug 17, 2017 14:12:58 GMT 3
The following figures will form the epic battle that will be in the supreme court.This is how we voted if the figures are correct:
1) Central 2,911,161-2,491,684-86%
2)Rift Valley 4,650,843-3,711,298-80%
3) Eastern 1,301,019-1,030,934-79%
4) Nyanza 2,688,717-2,100,595-78%
5)Lower Eastern 1,518,360-1,169,171-77%
6) Western 1,927,297-1,459,610-75%
7) North Eastern 643,642-480,480-75%
8) Nairobi 2,251,929-1,636,778-73%
9) Coast 1,714,096-1,112,865-69%
10) Diaspora 4,393-2,844-65%
Inferences
a)The perennial apathy in voter turnout in the NASA strong holds persisted this year despite the promise of "Canaan" read better managed country.
b) "Vifaranga vya Computer" managed to rally their supporters to turn out in large numbers
c) The so called computer generated chicks managed to infiltrate areas that they had performed poorly in 2013 i.e western,(Nyamira,Kisii) read Nyanza,Ukambani,North Eastern
Questions?Did the crowds in NASA rallies translate into votes? Were the results during the transmission tampered with?Was an algorithm introduced into the results transmission system?
NASA's case will hinge on whether the form 34As and 34Bs as generated from the polling centers and constituency tally centres marry or not and whether the results as transmitted tally with these hard copies.In the meantime sit back and enjoy the legal minds exchange arguments and counter arguments on what constitutes provisional and final results.The court ruled that results as announced at the polling centre was final and IEBC's role was just to announce them "as is"without any alterations.So were the results as streamed on the IEBC portal final and did not need any hard form 34As,34Bs and 34Cs to be provided at the National tally centre?
My hunch on how this one will be called is clear but let me not spoil the drama!
1) Central 2,911,161-2,491,684-86%
2)Rift Valley 4,650,843-3,711,298-80%
3) Eastern 1,301,019-1,030,934-79%
4) Nyanza 2,688,717-2,100,595-78%
5)Lower Eastern 1,518,360-1,169,171-77%
6) Western 1,927,297-1,459,610-75%
7) North Eastern 643,642-480,480-75%
8) Nairobi 2,251,929-1,636,778-73%
9) Coast 1,714,096-1,112,865-69%
10) Diaspora 4,393-2,844-65%
Inferences
a)The perennial apathy in voter turnout in the NASA strong holds persisted this year despite the promise of "Canaan" read better managed country.
b) "Vifaranga vya Computer" managed to rally their supporters to turn out in large numbers
c) The so called computer generated chicks managed to infiltrate areas that they had performed poorly in 2013 i.e western,(Nyamira,Kisii) read Nyanza,Ukambani,North Eastern
Questions?Did the crowds in NASA rallies translate into votes? Were the results during the transmission tampered with?Was an algorithm introduced into the results transmission system?
NASA's case will hinge on whether the form 34As and 34Bs as generated from the polling centers and constituency tally centres marry or not and whether the results as transmitted tally with these hard copies.In the meantime sit back and enjoy the legal minds exchange arguments and counter arguments on what constitutes provisional and final results.The court ruled that results as announced at the polling centre was final and IEBC's role was just to announce them "as is"without any alterations.So were the results as streamed on the IEBC portal final and did not need any hard form 34As,34Bs and 34Cs to be provided at the National tally centre?
My hunch on how this one will be called is clear but let me not spoil the drama!