Post by kamalet on Oct 9, 2017 9:34:07 GMT 3
Kenya is scheduled to have a fresh presidential election following a controversial annulment of the election by the supreme court of Kenya. The contest is between incumbent Uhuru Kenyatta and perennial opposition leader Raila Odinga. Following the order for a fresh election, Uhuru has been on a frenetic campaign programme going round the country appealing for votes and playing the usual Kenyan politics of promises of goodies etc. On the other hand, Raila has addressed rallies in Kibera, Kisii and parts of Kakamega all of which you can count on the fingers of your hands. However, he has been frenetic (apologies for repeating this one!) on the press conference circuit where he has bandied one reason (excuse) after another why the coming elections would not be fair and why this corporate or other should be boycotted. As I cannot explain the reasoning for this strategy, I can only assume it is the NASA campaign strategy.
The news though is the continued shouting that he will boycott the elections or in some extreme cases NASA will ensure there is no election all part of a strategy perhaps to create a constitutional situation whose outcome is uncertain.
But I can say here with no fear of contradiction - Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta will win the fresh elections by a larger margin than the 8th August election IF it is held. So what happens to Raila after this? Is this suggestion of an orbituary early?
In the Raila corner, there are two camps. One camp wants to see the end of his political relevance whilst the other wants Raila to remain relevant even after the elections or post 26/10/17 whatever the case. The former are seeing the same result I see (the Uhuru win) and must reckon that a Raila defeat seals his political coffin allowing them to lay claim the community vote that he has literally owned without his support. The latter would be more interested in the disruptive model that has been pushed by Raila i.e. boycott or disrupt the elections. The two options are increasingly becoming untenable as they do not have the support of many. So the option that seems to remain and which might even be aided by the Jubilee led election law amendments, RAILA WILL WITHDRAW from the elections. He will withdraw from the elections with the same reasons/excuses he has given previously allowing Uhuru to take the presidency for the last time. But Raila will retain the rights to complaining about the stolen election and the nefarious behaviour of IEBC as the reasons he did not become president hence his entitlement to remain noisily relevant as he exits the political stage. Such a strategy allows him to be in the position where he can actually appoint (annoint?) his successor which is what the disruptive camp would want.
Raila will exit the political stage at the end of October - which route will he choose to end it? Natural death or suicide?
The news though is the continued shouting that he will boycott the elections or in some extreme cases NASA will ensure there is no election all part of a strategy perhaps to create a constitutional situation whose outcome is uncertain.
But I can say here with no fear of contradiction - Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta will win the fresh elections by a larger margin than the 8th August election IF it is held. So what happens to Raila after this? Is this suggestion of an orbituary early?
In the Raila corner, there are two camps. One camp wants to see the end of his political relevance whilst the other wants Raila to remain relevant even after the elections or post 26/10/17 whatever the case. The former are seeing the same result I see (the Uhuru win) and must reckon that a Raila defeat seals his political coffin allowing them to lay claim the community vote that he has literally owned without his support. The latter would be more interested in the disruptive model that has been pushed by Raila i.e. boycott or disrupt the elections. The two options are increasingly becoming untenable as they do not have the support of many. So the option that seems to remain and which might even be aided by the Jubilee led election law amendments, RAILA WILL WITHDRAW from the elections. He will withdraw from the elections with the same reasons/excuses he has given previously allowing Uhuru to take the presidency for the last time. But Raila will retain the rights to complaining about the stolen election and the nefarious behaviour of IEBC as the reasons he did not become president hence his entitlement to remain noisily relevant as he exits the political stage. Such a strategy allows him to be in the position where he can actually appoint (annoint?) his successor which is what the disruptive camp would want.
Raila will exit the political stage at the end of October - which route will he choose to end it? Natural death or suicide?