Post by nowayhaha on Jul 15, 2012 15:27:20 GMT 3
www.nation.co.ke/News/politics/Railas+fightback+plan+amid+Miguna+storm/-/1064/1454064/-/yxh5ex/-/index.html
"This team has been calling for publicisation of some court cases Mr Miguna battled while in exile in Canada. One source within ODM, who requested anonymity because consultations are still ongoing, said: “Who is Miguna? :
Its evident Miguna has already done enough irredeemable damage to Railas presidential ambition any method to get at Miguna will be counterproductive as attested today by Raila himself . The only viable option the Raila think tank is considering to use is the rape case , ofcourse this will ultimately tilt the public perception is Miguna ready ?
Onyango Oloos role will also be questioned as the person who defended him in the court , his publicist and as the master of ceremony in the books launch
See below excerpts
www.mashada.com/forums/politics/5961-please-speak-out-4.html
"Onyango Oloo Onyango Oloo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: .
Posts: 5,502 (View Stats)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Onyango Oloo
Not Ranked : 0 score
Default some of the complexities of this case
i am still getting private messages from both and all sides of this issue.
like i said, as someone who knows first hand what it is to be railroaded, i firmly know and see the value of the hallowed legal principle of presumption of innocence.
and also having lost a sister to gender based violence i can relate to the hurt.
more than that, i have had to deal with this dilemma directly in canada over the last few months.
without going into details, a very good friend of mine found himself hauled to court on sexual abuse charges. i have known this individual for close to twenty years. but here is where it gets interesting. one of the complainant's in the case turned out to be none other than my own sister in law.
factor in also the rush to judgment with my friend already tried and convicted in the public mind with the tremendous gossip and people recoiling why i agreed to go to court- did i not care about my sister in law?
eventually i solved the problem in a very simple way:
i went to court and told the truth, as i knew it of the relationships between the two individuals without prejudging one side or the other. since the matter is undecided, i am operating on the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.
one of the hallmarks of an immigrant community's "maturity" for lack of a better word, is when people have settled in their adopted country long enough to start marrying and divorcing, buying property, and also, the unsavoury details- hauling each other to court or dealing with intra community tragedies such as the ongoing one in new jersey where one man stands accused of kiling another man0 both from kenya.
what i have learned from that case plus another one that i will not mention, the one i referred to and the one we are discussing is this:
we must learn our legal, political and civic rights and responsibilities.
often in the absence of structured organizations, the only outlets to express ourselves are forums like mashada and so on.
that is why we should use such forums responsibly, bearing in mind that in expressing ourselves and/or exercising our other rights, that we do not infringe on the rights of other people.
to take this case as a concrete learning point.
it is important for all of the alleged victims of the alleged sexual assaults to rally around each other and create their support network.
at the same time, this must be done in such a way as not to undermine the equally fundamental rights and freedoms of the accused person, such as for instance, their right to a free and fair trial that is predicated on two legal precepts- one, the presumption of innocence, and two, the onus of the prosecution in discharging the burden of proof until they have proved their case beyond the tiniest shadow of doubt.
perhaps what we can do right now, if we must continue this thread is to perhaps focus less on the specific allegations that need to be proved in court anyway and also stay away from personal attacks and smearing of any individuals.
those are my thoughts at this stage.
oo
mtl"
blog.jaluo.com/?p=3748
TEKERE JELULE
January 14th, 2010 - 04:22
In 2007, just before elections, ARUM TITI, wrote an article about Miguna Miguna. The words included this; ” Too rude and arrogant! ”
The very words that have come back to haunt Miguna Miguna and Raila! Miguna would never be able to hold any post there in Canada as a result of his troubles with the Law in Canada!
But he can be an adviser of the leader of African nation-Kenya! What a shock!
Miguna should have known to shut his big mouth! Moi must be smiling! He has not even opened his mouth yet, and Miguna is on fire! What a Kenyan politics we live in!
Brother Miguna, learn a thing or two. People are well informed now, with the damaging allegations of Rape upon your person, you are better off silent as a Church mouse!
Be it truth or false. These things stick, and they shall not be erased, no matter how much you try to disprove them!
Mr. Raila, if you are intelligent, get rid of him very fast!
jukwaa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=6325&page=12
nipate.com/this-is-why-miguna-miguna-should-not-celebrate-ruto-s-trials-and-tribulations-the-icc-t2171.html
Postby Doctor Masinde » Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:56 pm
All,
I have just concluded reading an article that appeared on one of our Kenyan Dailies by Miguna Miguna whose main juice was "attacks on Hon. William Ruto & celebrating the ICC cases". From that article it is evident that Miguna Miguna is celebrating the fact that Hon. Ruto may be facing the judges at the ICC, thereby, giving Miguna's boss (Raila) an easy route to State House. I find Miguna's celebrations premature, hypocritical and very insensitive.
Miguna Miguna should know better than celebrate any alleged suspect's predicament at the hands of foreign justice system. I say this because Miguna has experienced foreign justice system in Canada. Specifically, Miguna should know better since he himself faced serious allegations of rape (sexual assault) charges in Canada, and only escaped jail-term in a foreign land on the basis of technicalities (special thanks to his friend & defendant's key witness Onyango Oloo for revealing the true identity of the alleged rape victims..)
According to a Canadian Kenyan Observer, this is the story:
Miguna had two sexual abuse cases against him, (he had been accused by at least two vulnerable female Kenyan immigration case clients of his, that he had at various times sexually abused them in his law firm, taking advantage both of their dependent position and his overpowering physique).
Miguna then launched a flurry of mostly frivolous and baseless law suits against the Queen, the minister of Justice and the Crown Attorneys, the Toronto Police Board, any individual police officer who had arrested him and had worked his cases, based – as a learned Canadian judge of appeals poignantly stated – on “a galaxy of reasons, some existent in law, and many not”, of which he lost about 80pc and won non so far (a small part is still before the courts).
As you can read in the court decision in detail, Miguna was repeatedly laden with a significant amount of his many opponents’ costs (a middle six (6!) digit sum of Canadian dollars), which of course he was and is unable to pay – yet he continued and continues to litigate garrulously and, as the Ontario Appeals Court two times stated, with very little merit. His forced return to Kenya was more of a flight thus.
What is also interesting is that one of the main defense witnesses against the alleged female victims was one Onyango Oloo, apparently an activist friend of Miguna. The court decision relates in some detail, how Oloo in his own witness stand did his best to undermine the credibility of the abused prosecution witnesses and to exonerate his friend Miguna, and how he explained to the court that the witnesses were somehow related to each other which they however had denied before (they were half sisters from different fathers in reality, Oloo maintained, while the women/girls had previously alleged before the first-instance judge that they “were not sisters”. Such contradiction, among other points, led the judge to believe that the evidence – although probably some kind of abuse had indeed taken place – was not strong and not consistent enough to find Miguna guilty beyond any doubt.[/size] The case was thus dismissed and Miguna was acquitted because of insufficiently strong evidence.
kenyastockholm.com/2010/02/27/
As you can see from above, escaping jail-term on technicality does not necessarily mean that the alleged suspect is innocent. The main contradiction in the case was that the abused/victims maintained that they were not sisters while Miguna's friend Oloo (defendant's witness) maintained that the alleged victims were in fact blood sisters, etc. The entire case was based on whether or not the victims were colluding against Miguna, consequently, Oloo's testimony destroyed their credibility i.e the judge believed Oloo's opinion that the victims were sisters. The only reason why two sisters would not want to reveal that they are sisters in a Canadian court of law is if they were illegal immigrants and didn't want to risk being sent back to Kenya together. It is reported that the alleged "sisters" were allegedly illegal immigrants who had engaged lawyer Miguna to assist them with their immigration cases..it is alleged that the two sexual assault instances took place during their "client-lawyer" meetings in Miguna's office.
All I am saying is that before we celebrate Uhuru and/or Ruto's ICC predicament, lets just go ahead and remove the skeletons in our closets..and since I am a born again Christian, I wanna just quote the Book of Matthew 7:3
"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?
CASE REF: “Miguna Miguna V Toronto Police Services Board, 2008 ONCAa799”
Respectfully
kathure kebaara
Moderator
*****
member is offline
[send pm]
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,090
Re: MM turns down offer to resume work as PM Advis
« Reply #165 on Jan 8, 2012, 8:43am »
Jan 7, 2012, 11:03pm, Onyango Oloo wrote:
Jan 7, 2012, 8:43pm, okhunyanye wrote:
I saw Miguna caressing his crotch in that TV interview and I was like 'oh my God; this is bad optics especially in light of a previous rape case against Miguna Miguna in Canada.' MM should be aware that all his words, body language, intentions, and all will be analyzed and psychoanalyzed from now on and should take precautions to control for that. This is because unlike his belligerent stances against personalities in Kenya that he has engaged in in the past, he is now fighting an institution. Raila is an institution unto himself. You never win wars against institutions that easily.
Okhunyanye:
What was this previous rape case against Miguna Miguna in Canada?
I lived in the same province and in the same city with Miguna for close to twenty years.
Googling around this is what I found out:
Quote:
82The relatively liberal test for malice at the pleadings stage was explained by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Miguna v. Toronto (City) Police Services Board.83The plaintiff in Miguna was a lawyer who was accused of sexual assault by some of his clients. He was acquitted on all charges, and subsequently brought a “galaxy” of civil claims, including misfeasance in a public office, against police, prosecutors and the provincial government.84His statement of claim, filed initially in 2004 and amended in 2006, was struck out on both occasions by lower court judges.However, in 2008, the Court of Appeal reinstated most of the claim and allowed it to proceed.
One of the primary defects that had been cited by the defendants was that the plaintiff’s claim did not include sufficient particulars of malice, as required to support the claims in misfeasance in a public office and malicious prosecution. The motions judge, Spence J., had found the pleadings inadequate, using what the Court of Appeal described as an
80Nevertheless, a plaintiff cannot simply allege that “the impugned conduct” was malicious; see Hester v. Canada, [2007] O.J. No. 4719 (S.C.J.) (QL), aff’d 2008 ONCA 634, [2008] O.J. No. 3557 (C.A.) (QL). Nor can the plaintiff state malice as a bald legal conclusion; see Deep v. Ontario, [2004] O.T.C. 541 (S.C.J.), aff’d [2005] O.J. No. 1294 (C.A.) (QL).
81
82
83
84
(2007), 219 Man. R. (2d) 175 (Q.B.).
2008 ONCA 799, (2008), 301 D.L.R. (4th) 540.
Ibid. at 544.
The history of the pleadings can be found at 544-45 of the Court of Appeal’s decision, ibid.
What is the Role of Misfeasance in a Public Office...599 2009]
85overly critical approach to the pleadings and an overly narrow test for malice.In correcting the lower court’s error, the Court of Appeal stressed that the motion to strike is not the place to assess whether there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation of malice. Blair J.A. explained,
86Whether the evidence supporting the material facts pleaded in the claim is direct or circumstantial cannot be determined at this stage of the proceedings. Indeed, whether malice is the only reasonable inference that can be drawn from the facts pleaded is not something that is readily determined at the pleading stage. So much depends upon the testimony of the witnesses and the inferences and nuances to be drawn from that evidence. The proper test to be applied is whether it is plain and obvious that the material facts as pleaded could not lead to a finding of malice.
87The Court of Appeal hence stated the test in the negative: the action should only be struck out if it is plain and obvious that malice cannot be found. This is a relatively pro-plaintiff test, and will result in striking out only in the rare cases where the plaintiff has not identified a malicious act or malicious actor.
88The generous interpretation of the rules of civil procedure as they pertain to malice in misfeasance claims is consistent with the more general principle that plaintiffs should have the opportunity to prove their claims in court. Further, once the plaintiff makes an allegation of malice, it becomes a relevant issue on discovery.
This is what I was talking about.
Some folks have degenerated to such lows as actually making up stories about Miguna Miguna to score some dubious points.
Onyango Oloo
Nairobi, Kenya
Oloo
You're kidding me! You do not want to go there! I live in that same city where Miguna and you lived. People here on JUKWAA have brought up this case from time to time. I remained silent because I knew that most of them did not care about crimes committed against women but were out to get Miguna for other reasons. But if you Oloo want to go there, then lets duke it out on this one. Just because a person is acquitted of charges does not mean they are innocent in case you didn't know that already.
Do you remember what Miguna said publicly when Njeri Ngugi that is Ngugi wa Thiong'o's partner was raped in Nairobi? Do you remember too what Miguna said to Michere Mugo's daughter right in front of me at an event that we had organized at St. Christopher House right at Ossington and Dundas? If you and Miguna don't remember I for one do.
I have responded to you here publicly because you've put this out here in this public forum comrade.
Read more: jukwaa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=6325&page=12#ixzz20h3W88SY
"This team has been calling for publicisation of some court cases Mr Miguna battled while in exile in Canada. One source within ODM, who requested anonymity because consultations are still ongoing, said: “Who is Miguna? :
Its evident Miguna has already done enough irredeemable damage to Railas presidential ambition any method to get at Miguna will be counterproductive as attested today by Raila himself . The only viable option the Raila think tank is considering to use is the rape case , ofcourse this will ultimately tilt the public perception is Miguna ready ?
Onyango Oloos role will also be questioned as the person who defended him in the court , his publicist and as the master of ceremony in the books launch
See below excerpts
www.mashada.com/forums/politics/5961-please-speak-out-4.html
"Onyango Oloo Onyango Oloo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: .
Posts: 5,502 (View Stats)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Onyango Oloo
Not Ranked : 0 score
Default some of the complexities of this case
i am still getting private messages from both and all sides of this issue.
like i said, as someone who knows first hand what it is to be railroaded, i firmly know and see the value of the hallowed legal principle of presumption of innocence.
and also having lost a sister to gender based violence i can relate to the hurt.
more than that, i have had to deal with this dilemma directly in canada over the last few months.
without going into details, a very good friend of mine found himself hauled to court on sexual abuse charges. i have known this individual for close to twenty years. but here is where it gets interesting. one of the complainant's in the case turned out to be none other than my own sister in law.
factor in also the rush to judgment with my friend already tried and convicted in the public mind with the tremendous gossip and people recoiling why i agreed to go to court- did i not care about my sister in law?
eventually i solved the problem in a very simple way:
i went to court and told the truth, as i knew it of the relationships between the two individuals without prejudging one side or the other. since the matter is undecided, i am operating on the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.
one of the hallmarks of an immigrant community's "maturity" for lack of a better word, is when people have settled in their adopted country long enough to start marrying and divorcing, buying property, and also, the unsavoury details- hauling each other to court or dealing with intra community tragedies such as the ongoing one in new jersey where one man stands accused of kiling another man0 both from kenya.
what i have learned from that case plus another one that i will not mention, the one i referred to and the one we are discussing is this:
we must learn our legal, political and civic rights and responsibilities.
often in the absence of structured organizations, the only outlets to express ourselves are forums like mashada and so on.
that is why we should use such forums responsibly, bearing in mind that in expressing ourselves and/or exercising our other rights, that we do not infringe on the rights of other people.
to take this case as a concrete learning point.
it is important for all of the alleged victims of the alleged sexual assaults to rally around each other and create their support network.
at the same time, this must be done in such a way as not to undermine the equally fundamental rights and freedoms of the accused person, such as for instance, their right to a free and fair trial that is predicated on two legal precepts- one, the presumption of innocence, and two, the onus of the prosecution in discharging the burden of proof until they have proved their case beyond the tiniest shadow of doubt.
perhaps what we can do right now, if we must continue this thread is to perhaps focus less on the specific allegations that need to be proved in court anyway and also stay away from personal attacks and smearing of any individuals.
those are my thoughts at this stage.
oo
mtl"
blog.jaluo.com/?p=3748
TEKERE JELULE
January 14th, 2010 - 04:22
In 2007, just before elections, ARUM TITI, wrote an article about Miguna Miguna. The words included this; ” Too rude and arrogant! ”
The very words that have come back to haunt Miguna Miguna and Raila! Miguna would never be able to hold any post there in Canada as a result of his troubles with the Law in Canada!
But he can be an adviser of the leader of African nation-Kenya! What a shock!
Miguna should have known to shut his big mouth! Moi must be smiling! He has not even opened his mouth yet, and Miguna is on fire! What a Kenyan politics we live in!
Brother Miguna, learn a thing or two. People are well informed now, with the damaging allegations of Rape upon your person, you are better off silent as a Church mouse!
Be it truth or false. These things stick, and they shall not be erased, no matter how much you try to disprove them!
Mr. Raila, if you are intelligent, get rid of him very fast!
jukwaa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=6325&page=12
nipate.com/this-is-why-miguna-miguna-should-not-celebrate-ruto-s-trials-and-tribulations-the-icc-t2171.html
Postby Doctor Masinde » Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:56 pm
All,
I have just concluded reading an article that appeared on one of our Kenyan Dailies by Miguna Miguna whose main juice was "attacks on Hon. William Ruto & celebrating the ICC cases". From that article it is evident that Miguna Miguna is celebrating the fact that Hon. Ruto may be facing the judges at the ICC, thereby, giving Miguna's boss (Raila) an easy route to State House. I find Miguna's celebrations premature, hypocritical and very insensitive.
Miguna Miguna should know better than celebrate any alleged suspect's predicament at the hands of foreign justice system. I say this because Miguna has experienced foreign justice system in Canada. Specifically, Miguna should know better since he himself faced serious allegations of rape (sexual assault) charges in Canada, and only escaped jail-term in a foreign land on the basis of technicalities (special thanks to his friend & defendant's key witness Onyango Oloo for revealing the true identity of the alleged rape victims..)
According to a Canadian Kenyan Observer, this is the story:
Miguna had two sexual abuse cases against him, (he had been accused by at least two vulnerable female Kenyan immigration case clients of his, that he had at various times sexually abused them in his law firm, taking advantage both of their dependent position and his overpowering physique).
Miguna then launched a flurry of mostly frivolous and baseless law suits against the Queen, the minister of Justice and the Crown Attorneys, the Toronto Police Board, any individual police officer who had arrested him and had worked his cases, based – as a learned Canadian judge of appeals poignantly stated – on “a galaxy of reasons, some existent in law, and many not”, of which he lost about 80pc and won non so far (a small part is still before the courts).
As you can read in the court decision in detail, Miguna was repeatedly laden with a significant amount of his many opponents’ costs (a middle six (6!) digit sum of Canadian dollars), which of course he was and is unable to pay – yet he continued and continues to litigate garrulously and, as the Ontario Appeals Court two times stated, with very little merit. His forced return to Kenya was more of a flight thus.
What is also interesting is that one of the main defense witnesses against the alleged female victims was one Onyango Oloo, apparently an activist friend of Miguna. The court decision relates in some detail, how Oloo in his own witness stand did his best to undermine the credibility of the abused prosecution witnesses and to exonerate his friend Miguna, and how he explained to the court that the witnesses were somehow related to each other which they however had denied before (they were half sisters from different fathers in reality, Oloo maintained, while the women/girls had previously alleged before the first-instance judge that they “were not sisters”. Such contradiction, among other points, led the judge to believe that the evidence – although probably some kind of abuse had indeed taken place – was not strong and not consistent enough to find Miguna guilty beyond any doubt.[/size] The case was thus dismissed and Miguna was acquitted because of insufficiently strong evidence.
kenyastockholm.com/2010/02/27/
As you can see from above, escaping jail-term on technicality does not necessarily mean that the alleged suspect is innocent. The main contradiction in the case was that the abused/victims maintained that they were not sisters while Miguna's friend Oloo (defendant's witness) maintained that the alleged victims were in fact blood sisters, etc. The entire case was based on whether or not the victims were colluding against Miguna, consequently, Oloo's testimony destroyed their credibility i.e the judge believed Oloo's opinion that the victims were sisters. The only reason why two sisters would not want to reveal that they are sisters in a Canadian court of law is if they were illegal immigrants and didn't want to risk being sent back to Kenya together. It is reported that the alleged "sisters" were allegedly illegal immigrants who had engaged lawyer Miguna to assist them with their immigration cases..it is alleged that the two sexual assault instances took place during their "client-lawyer" meetings in Miguna's office.
All I am saying is that before we celebrate Uhuru and/or Ruto's ICC predicament, lets just go ahead and remove the skeletons in our closets..and since I am a born again Christian, I wanna just quote the Book of Matthew 7:3
"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?
CASE REF: “Miguna Miguna V Toronto Police Services Board, 2008 ONCAa799”
Respectfully
kathure kebaara
Moderator
*****
member is offline
[send pm]
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,090
Re: MM turns down offer to resume work as PM Advis
« Reply #165 on Jan 8, 2012, 8:43am »
Jan 7, 2012, 11:03pm, Onyango Oloo wrote:
Jan 7, 2012, 8:43pm, okhunyanye wrote:
I saw Miguna caressing his crotch in that TV interview and I was like 'oh my God; this is bad optics especially in light of a previous rape case against Miguna Miguna in Canada.' MM should be aware that all his words, body language, intentions, and all will be analyzed and psychoanalyzed from now on and should take precautions to control for that. This is because unlike his belligerent stances against personalities in Kenya that he has engaged in in the past, he is now fighting an institution. Raila is an institution unto himself. You never win wars against institutions that easily.
Okhunyanye:
What was this previous rape case against Miguna Miguna in Canada?
I lived in the same province and in the same city with Miguna for close to twenty years.
Googling around this is what I found out:
Quote:
82The relatively liberal test for malice at the pleadings stage was explained by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Miguna v. Toronto (City) Police Services Board.83The plaintiff in Miguna was a lawyer who was accused of sexual assault by some of his clients. He was acquitted on all charges, and subsequently brought a “galaxy” of civil claims, including misfeasance in a public office, against police, prosecutors and the provincial government.84His statement of claim, filed initially in 2004 and amended in 2006, was struck out on both occasions by lower court judges.However, in 2008, the Court of Appeal reinstated most of the claim and allowed it to proceed.
One of the primary defects that had been cited by the defendants was that the plaintiff’s claim did not include sufficient particulars of malice, as required to support the claims in misfeasance in a public office and malicious prosecution. The motions judge, Spence J., had found the pleadings inadequate, using what the Court of Appeal described as an
80Nevertheless, a plaintiff cannot simply allege that “the impugned conduct” was malicious; see Hester v. Canada, [2007] O.J. No. 4719 (S.C.J.) (QL), aff’d 2008 ONCA 634, [2008] O.J. No. 3557 (C.A.) (QL). Nor can the plaintiff state malice as a bald legal conclusion; see Deep v. Ontario, [2004] O.T.C. 541 (S.C.J.), aff’d [2005] O.J. No. 1294 (C.A.) (QL).
81
82
83
84
(2007), 219 Man. R. (2d) 175 (Q.B.).
2008 ONCA 799, (2008), 301 D.L.R. (4th) 540.
Ibid. at 544.
The history of the pleadings can be found at 544-45 of the Court of Appeal’s decision, ibid.
What is the Role of Misfeasance in a Public Office...599 2009]
85overly critical approach to the pleadings and an overly narrow test for malice.In correcting the lower court’s error, the Court of Appeal stressed that the motion to strike is not the place to assess whether there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation of malice. Blair J.A. explained,
86Whether the evidence supporting the material facts pleaded in the claim is direct or circumstantial cannot be determined at this stage of the proceedings. Indeed, whether malice is the only reasonable inference that can be drawn from the facts pleaded is not something that is readily determined at the pleading stage. So much depends upon the testimony of the witnesses and the inferences and nuances to be drawn from that evidence. The proper test to be applied is whether it is plain and obvious that the material facts as pleaded could not lead to a finding of malice.
87The Court of Appeal hence stated the test in the negative: the action should only be struck out if it is plain and obvious that malice cannot be found. This is a relatively pro-plaintiff test, and will result in striking out only in the rare cases where the plaintiff has not identified a malicious act or malicious actor.
88The generous interpretation of the rules of civil procedure as they pertain to malice in misfeasance claims is consistent with the more general principle that plaintiffs should have the opportunity to prove their claims in court. Further, once the plaintiff makes an allegation of malice, it becomes a relevant issue on discovery.
This is what I was talking about.
Some folks have degenerated to such lows as actually making up stories about Miguna Miguna to score some dubious points.
Onyango Oloo
Nairobi, Kenya
Oloo
You're kidding me! You do not want to go there! I live in that same city where Miguna and you lived. People here on JUKWAA have brought up this case from time to time. I remained silent because I knew that most of them did not care about crimes committed against women but were out to get Miguna for other reasons. But if you Oloo want to go there, then lets duke it out on this one. Just because a person is acquitted of charges does not mean they are innocent in case you didn't know that already.
Do you remember what Miguna said publicly when Njeri Ngugi that is Ngugi wa Thiong'o's partner was raped in Nairobi? Do you remember too what Miguna said to Michere Mugo's daughter right in front of me at an event that we had organized at St. Christopher House right at Ossington and Dundas? If you and Miguna don't remember I for one do.
I have responded to you here publicly because you've put this out here in this public forum comrade.
Read more: jukwaa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=6325&page=12#ixzz20h3W88SY