|
Post by nowayhaha on Jan 24, 2013 19:04:19 GMT 3
The National Alliance (TNA) wants action taken against Trade minister Moses Wetangula for alleged hate speech against its party leader during a campaign rally in Ukambani. In a terse letter to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) chairman Isaac Hassan, TNA chairman Johnson Sakaja termed the utterance by Mr Wetangula as reckless, provocative and unfounded. The minister, who is aligned to the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (Cord) reportedly made the disparaging comments during a rally on January 22. Mr Sakaja said the party was in possession of an audio recording of comments attributed to Mr Wetangula and had made them available to the commission. Tribal animosity TNA wants the Sirisia MP to be disqualified from running for political office in the coming election, for the remarks, which the TNA boss said risked causing tribal animosity. According to Mr Sakaja, the Ford Kenya leader reportedly referred to Uhuru Kenyatta as a land grabber and one who was incapable of leading the country. The party also provided a verbatim statement attributed to Mr Wetangula, which they said risked polarising the country. “My brother, my friend Uhuru Kenyatta, has no capacity to lead this country and doesn't deserve to lead this country. Because we know that that land was not bought, it was grabbed, and now it is being sold so as to get money to bribe people to vote for them so that they can get back into power. And we are telling you, you must refuse this,” Mr Wetangula is reported to have said while addressing a crowd at the Cord rally. Not factual Mr Sakaja said the comments by the minister were not factual, and wondered why politicians and rivals of Mr Kenyatta kept repeating similar sentiments, and yet Mr Kenyatta had challenged those with evidence that he had grabbed land to table it. “Hon Uhuru Kenyatta is on public record challenging his competitors to table any evidence of his alleged involvement in land grabbing. Instead, they continue to take comfort in outright propaganda, innuendo and negative campaigns,” he stated. He said such comments were to blame for the build-up of tension between communities, in the run up to the 2007 elections that led to eviction of people from their land on account that they had grabbed it. TNA warned that refusal to punish Mr Wetangula would encourage others to make similarly inflammatory remarks, and urged the IEBC to invoke its statutory powers to ensure the MP, who is seeking to be Senator for Bungoma County, be disqualified from the race. Mr Kenyatta, through the party secretariat, also refuted the bribery claims saying he did not need to bribe voters for as he already enjoyed popular support. www.nation.co.ke/News/politics/-/1064/1674252/-/aj315q/-/index.html
|
|
|
Post by mangai on Jan 24, 2013 19:49:08 GMT 3
The only thing that Wetangula might not prove is the issue of 'bribing' voters and in my opinion that does not amount to hate speech. There are other remedies at Uhuru's disposal.
Uhuru is known to spend a lot of money in campaigns and most of that money is said to be from family resources. What business has Uhuru been doing over the years to make him one of the wealthiest Kenyans around if not from what he inherited from his late father.
Is it not true that for instance Kenyatta and his relatives owned ALL that chunk of land south of Thika Road, from Githurai all the way to Thika up to Kilimambogo? To paraphrase Wetangula, was that land bought or ilinjakuliwa? How about at the Coast or Rift Valley?
Is Uhuru really ready to open such cans of worms?
|
|
|
Post by reporter911 on Jan 24, 2013 20:52:29 GMT 3
The only thing that Wetangula might not prove is the issue of 'bribing' voters and in my opinion that does not amount to hate speech. There are other remedies at Uhuru's disposal. Uhuru is known to spend a lot of money in campaigns and most of that money is said to be from family resources. What business has Uhuru been doing over the years to make him one of the wealthiest Kenyans around if not from what he inherited from his late father. Is it not true that for instance Kenyatta and his relatives owned ALL that chunk of land south of Thika Road, from Githurai all the way to Thika up to Kilimambogo? To paraphrase Wetangula, was that land bought or ilinjakuliwa? How about at the Coast or Rift Valley? Is Uhuru really ready to open such cans of worms? Mangai.. well said... Kenyans are waiting to hear where Uhuru's riches come from? lets not guess Uhuru should provide documented evidence starting from (read: Kenyatta era)let him open the cans of worms Kenyans are ready for him ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on Jan 24, 2013 21:49:11 GMT 3
The only thing that Wetangula might not prove is the issue of 'bribing' voters and in my opinion that does not amount to hate speech. There are other remedies at Uhuru's disposal. Uhuru is known to spend a lot of money in campaigns and most of that money is said to be from family resources. What business has Uhuru been doing over the years to make him one of the wealthiest Kenyans around if not from what he inherited from his late father. Is it not true that for instance Kenyatta and his relatives owned ALL that chunk of land south of Thika Road, from Githurai all the way to Thika up to Kilimambogo? To paraphrase Wetangula, was that land bought or ilinjakuliwa? How about at the Coast or Rift Valley? Is Uhuru really ready to open such cans of worms? Mangai Is this something you know for a fact that the land you allude to all belongs to the Kenyatta's and secondly that the land was grabbed? It is fine to fan rumours but when asked to put facts on the table people waffle around! The family owns considerable tracts of land, but I would like someone to stand up and make a claim S Malcolm Bell did on land grabbed by Moi in Kabarak!
|
|
|
Post by OtishOtish on Jan 24, 2013 21:54:29 GMT 3
On this one, I support TNA. Uhuru never stole anything. DADDY stole all of it, and JNR inherited it in a perfectly legal way ... well, "legalish", this being Kenya. In some places, knowingly being in possession of stolen property is a crime, but the extent to which that is so in Kenya is far from clear.
|
|
bob
Full Member
Posts: 238
|
Post by bob on Jan 24, 2013 22:07:35 GMT 3
A monkey cannot preside over a meeting that has to do with destruction of forests. The vitandawilis & parables are touching raw nerves. Hio ni kali .Coming from the coast it is important to note that the one or two families own land from mwatate to taveta a stretch of about 90 to 100kms ,how do you explain that ? From whom did they buy it from? In Mombasa along the front row overlooking the the beach,there is a stretch about 10-15kms which also belong to a few individuals & ironically from one ethnic background.
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on Jan 24, 2013 22:12:44 GMT 3
A monkey cannot preside over a meeting that has to do with destruction of forests. The vitandawilis & parables are touching raw nerves. Hio ni kali .Coming from the coast it is important to note that the one or two families own land from mwatate to taveta a stretch of about 90 to 100kms ,how do you explain that ? From whom did they buy it from? In Mombasa along the front row overlooking the the beach,there is a stretch about 10-15kms which also belong to a few individuals & ironically from one ethnic background. Are you able to actually pointout the 10-15 kilometers as I know the lenghth is way shorter than this?
|
|
|
Post by joblesscorner on Jan 24, 2013 22:46:32 GMT 3
Ezekiel 18:20
"The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him."
|
|
bob
Full Member
Posts: 238
|
Post by bob on Jan 24, 2013 22:47:16 GMT 3
A monkey cannot preside over a meeting that has to do with destruction of forests. The vitandawilis & parables are touching raw nerves. Hio ni kali .Coming from the coast it is important to note that the one or two families own land from mwatate to taveta a stretch of about 90 to 100kms ,how do you explain that ? From whom did they buy it from? In Mombasa along the front row overlooking the the beach,there is a stretch about 10-15kms which also belong to a few individuals & ironically from one ethnic background. Are you able to actually pointout the 10-15 kilometers as I know the lenghth is way shorter than this? The stretch could be more or less,but I have worked in the region for over a decade & can positively identify more than enough properties which fall under this scope.
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on Jan 24, 2013 22:53:15 GMT 3
Are you able to actually pointout the 10-15 kilometers as I know the lenghth is way shorter than this? The stretch could be more or less,but I have worked in the region for over a decade & can positively identify more than enough properties which fall under this scope. The allegation of grabbing implies a criminal offence being committed. Either the land belonged to an individual who was forced to give up the land or it is public land for which the Orengo ministry can certainly provide details to allow Kenyans claim back what was theirs. Unfortunately even Orengo of Cord cannot help us out,
|
|
|
Post by mangai on Jan 24, 2013 23:36:33 GMT 3
The only thing that Wetangula might not prove is the issue of 'bribing' voters and in my opinion that does not amount to hate speech. There are other remedies at Uhuru's disposal. Uhuru is known to spend a lot of money in campaigns and most of that money is said to be from family resources. What business has Uhuru been doing over the years to make him one of the wealthiest Kenyans around if not from what he inherited from his late father. Is it not true that for instance Kenyatta and his relatives owned ALL that chunk of land south of Thika Road, from Githurai all the way to Thika up to Kilimambogo? To paraphrase Wetangula, was that land bought or ilinjakuliwa? How about at the Coast or Rift Valley? Is Uhuru really ready to open such cans of worms? Mangai Is this something you know for a fact that the land you allude to all belongs to the Kenyatta's and secondly that the land was grabbed? It is fine to fan rumours but when asked to put facts on the table people waffle around! The family owns considerable tracts of land, but I would like someone to stand up and make a claim S Malcolm Bell did on land grabbed by Moi in Kabarak! Kamalet, Those are not rumours. From Clayworks, Kahawa Wendani, Kahawa Sukari including where Brookside stands, Juja Farm and further yonder to the 10,000 acres Mwalimu Farm, Githiruai Kizito, name them. In fact I am suprised that you are the only one in 'Jerusalem' who doesnt know about this. My only question is, did Kenyatta legally buy all that or alinyakua? Something else, have you ever wondered why Kibaki is refusing to set up the National Land Commission even after its membership was approved by Parliament long time ago? Part of their work would be to look into some of the past land allocations and nullify those that are found to have been done irregularly. It will definitely touch on raw nerves. When people say about implementing the constitution, those are some of the things they have in mind. Uhuru Kenyatta will definitely not implement that part of the constitution. Talking about land grabbing, do you know that Lamu County will probably be the only county at the Coast that TNA, ceteris paribus, is guaranteed Governor and Senator? Several years ago, the story on the ground goes, Jomo Kenyatta visited Lamu and the locals requested for tractors to help clear roads in the area. He heeded to their request but the next thing they knew were truck loads of people from Muranga and Kiambu 'wakimwawa'. 'Mlitaka tractors za kufyeka misitu lakini nimewaletea wakulima wa kufanya hiyo kazi', Jomo Kenyatta was later to tell the locals. Up came the present day Mpeketoni Settlement Scheme, the most densely populated area of Lamu, outside the archipelago. Question is, did he buy that land for those upcountry people?
|
|
|
Post by joblesscorner on Jan 24, 2013 23:57:33 GMT 3
Mangai,Interesting read, what about the Criscos family, not sure if the name is right, was that grabbed too? Kamalet, Those are not rumours. From Clayworks, Kahawa Wendani, Kahawa Sukari including where Brookside stands, Juja Farm and further yonder to the 10,000 acres Mwalimu Farm, Githiruai Kizito, name them. In fact I am suprised that you are the only one in 'Jerusalem' who doesnt know about this. My only question is, did Kenyatta legally buy all that or alinyakua? Something else, have you ever wondered why Kibaki is refusing to set up the National Land Commission even after its membership was approved by Parliament long time ago? Part of their work would be to look into some of the past land allocations and nullify those that are found to have been done irregularly. It will definitely touch on raw nerves. When people say about implementing the constitution, those are some of the things they have in mind. Uhuru Kenyatta will definitely not implement that part of the constitution. Talking about land grabbing, do you know that Lamu County will probably be the only county at the Coast that TNA, ceteris paribus, is guaranteed Governor and Senator? Several years ago, the story on the ground goes, Jomo Kenyatta visited Lamu and the locals requested for tractors to help clear roads in the area. He heeded to their request but the next thing they knew were truck loads of people from Muranga and Kiambu 'wakimwawa'. 'Mlitaka tractors za kufyeka misitu lakini nimewaletea wakulima wa kufanya hiyo kazi', Jomo Kenyatta was later to tell the locals. Up came the present day Mpeketoni Settlement Scheme, the most densely populated area of Lamu, outside the archipelago. Question is, did he buy that land for those upcountry people?
|
|
|
Post by reporter911 on Jan 25, 2013 1:11:42 GMT 3
Mangai Is this something you know for a fact that the land you allude to all belongs to the Kenyatta's and secondly that the land was grabbed? It is fine to fan rumours but when asked to put facts on the table people waffle around! The family owns considerable tracts of land, but I would like someone to stand up and make a claim S Malcolm Bell did on land grabbed by Moi in Kabarak! Kamalet, Those are not rumours. From Clayworks, Kahawa Wendani, Kahawa Sukari including where Brookside stands, Juja Farm and further yonder to the 10,000 acres Mwalimu Farm, Githiruai Kizito, name them. In fact I am suprised that you are the only one in 'Jerusalem' who doesnt know about this. My only question is, did Kenyatta legally buy all that or alinyakua? Something else, have you ever wondered why Kibaki is refusing to set up the National Land Commission even after its membership was approved by Parliament long time ago? Part of their work would be to look into some of the past land allocations and nullify those that are found to have been done irregularly. It will definitely touch on raw nerves. When people say about implementing the constitution, those are some of the things they have in mind. Uhuru Kenyatta will definitely not implement that part of the constitution. Talking about land grabbing, do you know that Lamu County will probably be the only county at the Coast that TNA, ceteris paribus, is guaranteed Governor and Senator? Several years ago, the story on the ground goes, Jomo Kenyatta visited Lamu and the locals requested for tractors to help clear roads in the area. He heeded to their request but the next thing they knew were truck loads of people from Muranga and Kiambu 'wakimwawa'. 'Mlitaka tractors za kufyeka misitu lakini nimewaletea wakulima wa kufanya hiyo kazi', Jomo Kenyatta was later to tell the locals. Up came the present day Mpeketoni Settlement Scheme, the most densely populated area of Lamu, outside the archipelago. Question is, did he buy that land for those upcountry people? Mangai!! well said and your query! We are all waiting for Uhuru'TNA" supporter to answer with the facts posted here on jukwaa maybe the Mau Mau veteran too have some questions!!;D ;D but be careful with your questions and threads you might just be the next name on their compaign of kicking members off Jukwaa whenever Uhuru"TNA" is mentioned or questions asked about his riches ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by denno on Jan 25, 2013 2:02:51 GMT 3
To Mangai and R911 isn't J Orengo in charge of the lands ministry? why can't he/why hasn't he produced anything concrete listing land grabbers? Suffice to say that if that info was readily available then this is the best time to pass it on to the public don't you agree?
|
|
|
Post by OtishOtish on Jan 25, 2013 5:23:27 GMT 3
A little story: I decided that I would never vote for a thief. But someone pointed out to me that they are all thieves. So I thought I might settle on the least "thiefly" one. But it was pointed out to me that a lesser thief is still a thief. And so on, and so forth ... Now, I have decided to look at who will do what and when ... to uplift Kenya---policies, plans, things that might change the lives of the "average" Kenyan.
I'll let you know as soon as I hear anything.
|
|
|
Post by mangai on Jan 25, 2013 6:35:29 GMT 3
To Mangai and R911 isn't J Orengo in charge of the lands ministry? why can't he/why hasn't he produced anything concrete listing land grabbers? Suffice to say that if that info was readily available then this is the best time to pass it on to the public don't you agree? Denno, Orengo cannot rectify in five years the wrongs and what has now come to pass as historical injustices as far as land ownership is concerned. That is why the constitution set up the powerful National Land Commission to look into some of those issues but Kibaki has deliberately decided to sabotage its operations. At the beginning I posed the rhetorical question, Does Uhuru really want to open those cans of worms regarding land ownership in this country? Do you for instance know that many of the landless central Kenya natives had to be resettled in the Rift Valley because most of the land from settlers was acquired by a few land barons in the process disfranchising many people? Do you also know that the present day Nyandarua District was actually Maasai land (have you heard of Ol Joro Orok/Ol Kalou) but was later converted into a 'Settlement Scheme' for central province 'natives' as were then called? Do you also know that when large swatches of Kipsigis land was taken by the multinational tea companies in Kericho, the natives were never equally compensated with similar settlement schemes, save for a few in Kuresoi hence the genesis of claims to historical injustices by the Kalenjins in the Rift Valley? I warn again, let those sleeping dogs lie!
|
|
|
Post by mangai on Jan 25, 2013 6:45:04 GMT 3
Mangai,Interesting read, what about the Criscos family, not sure if the name is right, was that grabbed too? Kamalet, Those are not rumours. From Clayworks, Kahawa Wendani, Kahawa Sukari including where Brookside stands, Juja Farm and further yonder to the 10,000 acres Mwalimu Farm, Githiruai Kizito, name them. In fact I am suprised that you are the only one in 'Jerusalem' who doesnt know about this. My only question is, did Kenyatta legally buy all that or alinyakua? Something else, have you ever wondered why Kibaki is refusing to set up the National Land Commission even after its membership was approved by Parliament long time ago? Part of their work would be to look into some of the past land allocations and nullify those that are found to have been done irregularly. It will definitely touch on raw nerves. When people say about implementing the constitution, those are some of the things they have in mind. Uhuru Kenyatta will definitely not implement that part of the constitution. Talking about land grabbing, do you know that Lamu County will probably be the only county at the Coast that TNA, ceteris paribus, is guaranteed Governor and Senator? Several years ago, the story on the ground goes, Jomo Kenyatta visited Lamu and the locals requested for tractors to help clear roads in the area. He heeded to their request but the next thing they knew were truck loads of people from Muranga and Kiambu 'wakimwawa'. 'Mlitaka tractors za kufyeka misitu lakini nimewaletea wakulima wa kufanya hiyo kazi', Jomo Kenyatta was later to tell the locals. Up came the present day Mpeketoni Settlement Scheme, the most densely populated area of Lamu, outside the archipelago. Question is, did he buy that land for those upcountry people? Joblesscorner, I dont have facts of that but I have heard that Basil Criticos (former Taveta mp) family together with the Kenyatta family owns/owned huge chunks of land most of which forms the present day Taveta constituency.
|
|
bob
Full Member
Posts: 238
|
Post by bob on Jan 25, 2013 9:21:20 GMT 3
Like I said before two families own a stretch of 90-100kms between mwatate and taveta,but the indigenous are squatters,this is not fiction it is real,anyone who wants to believe otherwise is not serious,maybe he or she might want to check who owns Thiririka Investments & what properties a company call interger properties manages especially in the coast (Mombasa) . This is not rocket science. Let us not argue for the sake of it or on tribal/party lines,if land was acquired irregularly it remains just that. In any case who doesn't want to own land? The mode of acquisition is what is contentious. Kuna kununua & unyakuzi period.
|
|
|
Post by kamalet on Jan 25, 2013 11:31:05 GMT 3
Like I said before two families own a stretch of 90-100kms between mwatate and taveta,but the indigenous are squatters,this is not fiction it is real,anyone who wants to believe otherwise is not serious,maybe he or she might want to check who owns Thiririka Investments & what properties a company call interger properties manages especially in the coast (Mombasa) . This is not rocket science. Let us not argue for the sake of it or on tribal/party lines,if land was acquired irregularly it remains just that. In any case who doesn't want to own land? The mode of acquisition is what is contentious. Kuna kununua & unyakuzi period. na ukinyakua, kuna yule unanyakua toka kwake. Ushamsikia akilia shamba lake kunyakuliwa?
|
|
|
Post by nowayhaha on Jan 25, 2013 13:34:07 GMT 3
The stretch could be more or less,but I have worked in the region for over a decade & can positively identify more than enough properties which fall under this scope. The allegation of grabbing implies a criminal offence being committed. Either the land belonged to an individual who was forced to give up the land or it is public land for which the Orengo ministry can certainly provide details to allow Kenyans claim back what was theirs. Unfortunately even Orengo of Cord cannot help us out, Kamalet , You are right on this one. Here is an example of land grabbing excerpts from the Ndungu report. www.marsgroupkenya.org/pdfs/Oct_07/Main_Report/Part_4-Findings_And_Recommendations.pdf"On most occasions the loss of corporation land was triggered by the actions of the commissioner of lands without involving the corporation management. After specially designed correspondences a letter of allotment would be issued by the commissioner of lands to an individual or company for land belonging to the corporation. A grant title would subsequently be made to the same individual or to a third party to whom the land would have been sold through an informal transfer of a letter of allotment. The corporation management would wake up to a rude fact that their land had been acquired and title issued thereto without their knowledge. At other times , the illegal allocation of state corporations land usually triggered by irregular surrenders of corporation land . A letter of surrender would be written by either the corporation (managing director, managing trustee, director etc) The letter would be addressed to the Commissioner of lands stating that the corporation no longer needed a specified parcel of land. Almost immediately an individual or company would apply to be allocated the land in question. The Commissioner of lands would then make an allocation of the land to the applicant by issuing a respective letter of allotment. If the land was large in size, the allottee would apply for consent to subdivide the same into different units. The commissioner would again grant the consent to subdivide the land.Next the allottees would sell the land so illegally acquired to one or different purchasers for millions of shillings ! Thus in a space of say three months a civil servant ,a politician , a political operative etc would transform from an ordinary Kenyan, financially struggling like many others into a multi-millionaire. Thanks to the rampant illegal allocation and sale of state corporation land. The state corporations that lost lands allocated to them in this manner were usually strategic enterprises which required huge chunks of lands to be able to carry out their mandate .Thus state corporations such as Kenya Railways Corporation, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd, various Development Authorities, Kenya Airports Authority , Kenya Industrial Estates Ltd etc lost huge chunks of their land in these circumstances. The Commision also found that other state corporations would be mismanaged and end up in receivership or liquidation , following which the corporations assets , including land would be sold at throw away prices or the land would simply be allocated by the commissioner of lands to favoured individuals. One such case is that of the Kenya Food and Chemical Corporation Limited of Kisumu commonly known as the “ Molasses Project” This energy saving project was conceived by the Government in the 1970’s and was intended to manufacture gasohol from sugar cane molasses which was produced by sugar factories in Nyanza and Western Provinces . Land for the project was compulsorily acquired by the Government in 1976 at 4 million shillings. Although hundreds of millions of tax payers funds were invested in the project it stalled in the 1980’s and the company was put under receivership and remains as such to this day.Land for the project was offered to the company by a letter of allotment but this was never formally accepted or paid for and no title was issued . However in 2001 the commissioner of Lands S.S.K. Mwaita allocated the land to a company known as Spectre International Limited for 3.7 million shillings or KShs 33,000 per hectare.The land measures approximately 112 hectres and comprises of seven blocks the particulars of which are as follows 1. L.R. No 26453 area 26.10 ha user horticultural 2. L.R. No 26454 area 39.00 ha user industrial 3. L.R. No 26455 area 13.40 ha user residential 4. L.R. No 26456 area 21.23 ha ,user residential 5. L.R No 26457 area 3.50ha. user recreational 6. L.R. No 26458 area 2.20 ha , user health clinic 7. L.R. No 26459 area 6.50ha user educational The direct allocation of alienated Government land to the company by the commissioner of Lands was illegal.It was not clear how the government then intended , if at all , to revive or sell the project having already allocated the seven blocks of land to Spectre International Limited a private company."
|
|
|
Post by nowayhaha on Jan 25, 2013 13:49:11 GMT 3
Many people have quoted the Ndungu report as the one pointing to Kenyattas land grabbing . Here is Ndungu himself confirming Kenyatta bought 99% of the land he owns . Talk of debunking the myth
|
|
|
Post by nowayhaha on Jan 25, 2013 13:57:16 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by mzee on Jan 25, 2013 14:11:38 GMT 3
Wetangula laughs at the suggestion that action should be taken against him for saying that the kenyattas have land the size of nyanza that was acquired illegally. Yaani if you say that a thief is a thief you are penalized? ?? The land issue has to be tabled. We cant keep under rags forever. People from RVP are you hearing me?
|
|
|
Post by mank on Jan 25, 2013 18:22:53 GMT 3
A monkey cannot preside over a meeting that has to do with destruction of forests. The vitandawilis & parables are touching raw nerves. Hio ni kali .Coming from the coast it is important to note that the one or two families own land from mwatate to taveta a stretch of about 90 to 100kms ,how do you explain that ? From whom did they buy it from? In Mombasa along the front row overlooking the the beach,there is a stretch about 10-15kms which also belong to a few individuals & ironically from one ethnic background. Hicho kitendawili hakina msimamo, hata! People destroy forests. Monkeys don't. Yet people preside over meetings to do with destruction of forests. As for the coast story, there is no law that says one or two families, or a few individuals from the same ethnic background, cannot own as much land as you allege is onwed by such parties at the coast. You seem to be infruriated by the family or ethnic backgrounds of the parties owning the land, and not specifically by any criminal deeds by those parties, else such criminal deeds are what you would have highlighted rather than the family and ethnic backgrounds.
|
|
|
Post by raiswakesho on Jan 25, 2013 19:34:23 GMT 3
I ALSO KNOW VERY WELL THAT THE VAST LAND OWNED BY KENYATTA FAMILY WAS NOT BOUGHT. HON. UHURU KENYATTA AS A BENEFICIARY OF ILL GOTTEN WEALTH AND FAILING TO GIVE BACK SUCH LAND MAKES HIM UNFIT TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY.
THE FIRST PRESIDENT ABUSED HIS OFFICE AND EVERY KENYAN OF SOUND MIND SHOULD KNOW THIS AND IT'S NONSENSE TO ASK FOR EVIDENCE.
BY THE WAY, HON. WATENGULA IS A DISTINGUISHED ATTORNEY WHO THINKS BEFORE HE SPEAKS. TNA ANS CO. WANTS TO USE LEGAL AVENUES/TACTICS TO SUPRESS ANY DISCUSSION OF MZEE JOMO'S CORRUPTION AND LAND GRABBING. WELL, IF THEY SUCCEED TO DO SO AND I DOUBT THEY WILL, MAY THE KENYATTA FAMILY REST ASSURED THAT ONE DAY THEY'LL BE CALLED TO ANSWER.
|
|