Post by Sam Ochola on Feb 11, 2013 5:34:05 GMT 3
It is my opinion that Raila should skip today’s Presidential debate or send a lieutenant like Hon Abu Namwamba to stand for him.
I take fault with CORD Presidential strategy team lacking foresight and committing the candidate to this worthless exposure. The only serious Presidential contender of Raila’s stature and therefore CORD’s concern is Jubilee’s Uhuru Kenyatta and to a lesser extent Amani’s Musalia Mudavadi.
It adds zero value for a Presidential front-runner debating prime with a crowd of political minions for the sake of it. With due respect to PK, Karua and the lot, they stand a snowball’s chance in hell of winning this election. Empirically they are non- starters with nothing to loose. To them therefore this debate is a God-sent platform & exciting opportunity to heckle, bash & punch above their weights; all for the attention their bids have so far failed to attract on the “political free market”.
Back in 2007 count-down to the polls, Kalonzo Musyoka then running distant third insisted on a debate with Raila. ODM out-rightly rebuffed the calls on account that Raila would only debate with main challenger Kibaki, then of PNU. Similar wisdom should have prevailed this time in CORD.
I understand the excitement of staging this event but even in USA and the democracies (which I believe we’re trying to shadow) there are benchmarks and thresholds of whom to put where. There were other candidates running alongside Obama and Romney for the Presidency. They were simply accorded scopes of their worth in the race.
Narrowing the field would have been easier if both Jubilee and Cord for once got in one accord and insisted to the debate organizers to exclude jokers as a condition for their participation. My point is a true Presidential debate ought to be between/among two or three heavy-weights whom the public ought to interrogate and compare/contrast for the very fact that have realistic chance of assuming the office.
Finally I’m also concerned about the moderators of this debate. I find most of our Kenyan journalist to be either shallow (lacking the acumen), biased or timid to rebut politicians and pundits in a manner that brings them to accountability. For example Julie Gichuru (selected for this evening) is one such awesome TV star, I thoroughly adore this lady but she is a tick-box and hollow with respect to political discussions/shows. She shows little mastery of this field. I could be too colored by British standards but that it is my take of the media in my native homeland... Someone like Jeff Koinange (assuming he was not-at large) has impeccable talent for such task but yet too compromised to referee an impartial debate.
I hope the moderators will prove me wrong by setting the natural tempo for the debate as opposed a boring academic presentations among the contenders.
I take fault with CORD Presidential strategy team lacking foresight and committing the candidate to this worthless exposure. The only serious Presidential contender of Raila’s stature and therefore CORD’s concern is Jubilee’s Uhuru Kenyatta and to a lesser extent Amani’s Musalia Mudavadi.
It adds zero value for a Presidential front-runner debating prime with a crowd of political minions for the sake of it. With due respect to PK, Karua and the lot, they stand a snowball’s chance in hell of winning this election. Empirically they are non- starters with nothing to loose. To them therefore this debate is a God-sent platform & exciting opportunity to heckle, bash & punch above their weights; all for the attention their bids have so far failed to attract on the “political free market”.
Back in 2007 count-down to the polls, Kalonzo Musyoka then running distant third insisted on a debate with Raila. ODM out-rightly rebuffed the calls on account that Raila would only debate with main challenger Kibaki, then of PNU. Similar wisdom should have prevailed this time in CORD.
I understand the excitement of staging this event but even in USA and the democracies (which I believe we’re trying to shadow) there are benchmarks and thresholds of whom to put where. There were other candidates running alongside Obama and Romney for the Presidency. They were simply accorded scopes of their worth in the race.
Narrowing the field would have been easier if both Jubilee and Cord for once got in one accord and insisted to the debate organizers to exclude jokers as a condition for their participation. My point is a true Presidential debate ought to be between/among two or three heavy-weights whom the public ought to interrogate and compare/contrast for the very fact that have realistic chance of assuming the office.
Finally I’m also concerned about the moderators of this debate. I find most of our Kenyan journalist to be either shallow (lacking the acumen), biased or timid to rebut politicians and pundits in a manner that brings them to accountability. For example Julie Gichuru (selected for this evening) is one such awesome TV star, I thoroughly adore this lady but she is a tick-box and hollow with respect to political discussions/shows. She shows little mastery of this field. I could be too colored by British standards but that it is my take of the media in my native homeland... Someone like Jeff Koinange (assuming he was not-at large) has impeccable talent for such task but yet too compromised to referee an impartial debate.
I hope the moderators will prove me wrong by setting the natural tempo for the debate as opposed a boring academic presentations among the contenders.