|
|
Post by Luol Deng on Sept 27, 2014 23:45:05 GMT 3
dineo,
As I stated before, the case is best left to the institutions to handle. Not only did Shailja report the incident but she has several organisations providing her with backing. The details of the incident are still hazy. The amount of information was not enough to draw conclusions on what happened, but it sure was enough to manufacture a hashtag on twitter and to lynch the suspect.
The initial version of the story is that there was a gathering of poets on Saturday at prof. Wambui Mwangi's residence in Spring Valley Nairobi. Tony Mochama sexually assaulted Shailja Patel and there were witnesses to attest to fact. From what we have gathered thus far, nobody stood up to defend Shailja. Sunday was quiet and on Monday with the disclosure of the incident, the social media went ballistic. The case was subsequently reported on Thursday.
There are witnesses who state that Shailja was indeed assaulted. Michael Onsando, Kenne Mwikya, etc. But strangely they did nothing on Saturday. Failed to report to the Spring Valley police station, were not intending to do so. The case was only reported after pressure was applied, from other quarters.
Tony Mochama has denied sexually assaulting Shailja, he also has a witness, Wanjeri Nderu, who has contradicted fundamental aspects of the twitter testimony of the main witnesses. You can read her take on the whole episode for yourself on her timeline @wanjerinderu.
In this case we have 2 diametrically opposite testimonies and in both cases we have witnesses. The story was irresponsibly handled on the social media without the facts being given to the public. Now, assuming that a ruling is made in favour of Tony, what happens? The opinion of the social media has already been shaped. It is clear that the owner of the house wasn't even around, she then went on to claim that she was present when Shailja was being assaulted and proceeded to call Mochama a rapist. It is clear that the prof. is clearly lying and that doesn't do Shailja's case any favours. Whichever way this thing goes, this case has been bungled.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2014 1:33:27 GMT 3
|
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Sept 28, 2014 1:41:20 GMT 3
Jakaswanga,
"A totally inebriated pest --as B6k no doubt would declare, can hardly be responsible for his actions."You mean like drunk drivers who mow down pedestrians?? Or drunk men who rape women or children?? Why are you people downplaying (excusing) Mochama's behaviour?  And whether or not Shailja was "pressured" into filing a case with the police is irrelevant. The way you people are talking, she's a 'nice girl who excused Mochama's picadillo until those evil civil society types twisted her arms and 'forced' her to report the incident. All hogwash. Any woman that has been sexually harassed or abused first has to go through the embarrassment and self-loathing that come with the incident. Who knows where Shailja's mind was immediately after the incident? Who knows how she was feeling other than herself?? I commend her for going to the police and sympathise with her for what she has gone through. She is in my prayers. It's so interesting when men such as yourselves start 'analysing' the sexual predator acts of your fellow brethren and then start claiming to know how the woman - the victim - feels. As for Mochama vis a vis these civil society types, I am not coming to his defense but I believe that the manner in which he has been attacked by some of them - if not all - is highly tainted by Classism. Anyone with a brain can see that he is not a part of their 'class'. Anyone who knows that group of writers, poets and 'concerned' individuals knows that they are a bunch of classist fools for the most part. Fools with some talent. Mochama has a looooooooong history of misogyny, of sexual harassment, of just outright BS against women. If he did this - and I believe he did - he should fry. Sister Dineo, I think in law culpability is grounded on being in full possession of faculties or senses. That is why people can plead insanity, or temporary insanity. In drunken drivers, I think the law categorically states the charge: DRUNK and dangerous driving. To drive drunk is already an offence. Mowing pedestrians down under that influence, an exercabation in the charge sheet. When it comes to drunken grabbing of females, socialisation tends to include that mingling between the sexes tends to occur, in places like Kenya, in environments heavily poisoned with smoke and drink. Drinking itself is not then an offence, the grabbing may be an offence, and can be committed under inebriation, raising the legal possibility of non culpability. Now that is the point i was trying to make without necessarily belittling the feelings of the poet. Originally she was of mind to go for ''restitutive social justice''. I imagine she was not then resolved to go to court. |
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Sept 29, 2014 11:07:39 GMT 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Sept 29, 2014 14:50:05 GMT 3
Ever since we launched Jukwaa way back in August 2005, I have NEVER seen a SINGLE THREAD go this viral over such a short time!
OO
|
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Sept 29, 2014 21:02:58 GMT 3
Ever since we launched Jukwaa way back in August 2005, I have NEVER seen a SINGLE THREAD go this viral over such a short time!OO Of course Pyongyang was hardly the place for celebrity tabloid  tales about drunken black males with wanton appetites unleashed on coy and delicate Asian flesh!? This is a scandal which dredges a dark but explosive taboo area! and then airs it all there for a free for all in a liberated republic! Everywhere a blockbuster! Even in Pyongyang! ---But Kidero slaps Shebbesh wasn't bad either, was it!?  jukwaa.proboards.com/thread/8667/shebesh-slapped-kidero |
|
|
|
Post by OtishOtish on Sept 30, 2014 1:24:34 GMT 3
Ever since we launched Jukwaa way back in August 2005, I have NEVER seen a SINGLE THREAD go this viral over such a short time!OO
Anything to do with in+out is always exciting. And rightly so: history tells us that kingdoms and empires---great and small---have risen or fallen solely on the basis of .... ... men perish in an abyss that's only a few inches deep, women manage to hang themselves with a rope that's only a few inches long.
Folks needed a break from referending about nothing, or listening to a "summoned witness" insist that Ruto was not an influential politician in 2007, or being told that the MCAs now want this on top of that, or ... And then came this one:
"Drunken Bum Tries To Force His Stiff End Into Famous Poet! Is Forced To Flee! Natives Go Crazy With Excitement!"
Apologies. I was in the middle of switching from Nipate to Jukwaa. Ah ... this is what I wanted to write here
"Local Writer Has Colourful Encounter With Coy Poet. Gets Escorted Away By Friends. Citizens Comment".
Manamba style in the High Society of Spring Valley.
It was bound to attract some attention, from both manambas and the "high society" ... and the in-betweeners weren't going to be left out of it. Any sort of common ground is very rare these days ...
Still, it's time to move on and focus in bigger things; Vision 2030 arrives tomorrow.
Complaints have been filed with the Kenyan Police. This is a highly regarded force that has a sure-fire method for investigating and solving all criminal problems: "This is very serious. We have asked them to come in and record statements. We will leave no stone unturned (if we can find a stone). We will not rest until we bring the culprits to justice. When we find them. But we already know them: they are controlled by local politicians. In fact, we have been trailing them for a long time"
While the Kenyan Police record, investigate, and trail, life in the Sensible World must continue. And in that world, the Mochama fellow should offer sincere apologies and then make serious effort to mend his ways. And his "manly, macho, real-men, dog" buddies should offer help.
|
|
dineo
Junior Member
Posts: 75
|
Post by dineo on Sept 30, 2014 1:27:50 GMT 3
This is the time to NOT move on to 'bigger' things. This thread has gone viral for many salacious reasons, but it has traveled far and wide because women and girls continue to be sexually assaulted by idiot Kenyan men. And other weak Kenyan men (and some women) choose to ignore this seemingly neverending crime.
How much 'bigger' could it get than the discovery that Mutula Kilonzo - the former Justice Minister - was a sick pederast child molester? The Justice Minister. And how quickly did that episode disappear while Kenyans moved on to 'bigger' things???
Now some silly writer (who is a legend in his own mind) allegedly - and I use the term loosely - assaults a woman and more time is spent attacking those that brought the alleged crime to light than is spent on the victim.
I ask the men who've commented on this thread: what is it about some of you and many of your countrymen that allows you to think that sexual assault of a woman or girl is something 'small'?
I wonder if sexual assault on your person, or your sons would be some small matter that we can move from?
Luol Deng,
Wambui Mwangi was wrong for her hysterical attack on Mochama and lost some credibility with many of the people who would have supported her allegations *had she gone about it differently* from the very beginning. But that is in a perfect world and we all know our country - when it comes to crimes against females - is entirely imperfect. I also think that a lot of the attacks on Mochama were wrapped up in, or tinged with Classism, but I also don't fault Wambui Mwangi for acting the way she did. Because that was the ONLY way to bring attention to the matter. Kenyans respond very well to drama, the more salacious the better. If she had accompanied Shailja to the Police Station quietly, we all know this case would have gone nowhere and Mochama would be scripting some other weird story in which women are his playground.
But now he's sweating.
Women always ask men to think of their mothers, wives and daughters whenever the subject of sexual assault comes up. But truly, the way I see it, if a Kenyan man watched his GRANDMOTHER get raped, he would pretend like it had never happened. Or he would blame her.
|
|
|
|
Post by OtishOtish on Sept 30, 2014 4:26:12 GMT 3
This is the time to NOT move on to 'bigger' things. This thread has gone viral for many salacious reasons, but it has traveled far and wide because women and girls continue to be sexually assaulted by idiot Kenyan men. And other weak Kenyan men (and some women) choose to ignore this seemingly neverending crime. How much 'bigger' could it get than the discovery that Mutula Kilonzo - the former Justice Minister - was a sick pederast child molester? The Justice Minister. And how quickly did that episode disappear while Kenyans moved on to 'bigger' things??? Now some silly writer (who is a legend in his own mind) allegedly - and I use the term loosely - assaults a woman and more time is spent attacking those that brought the alleged crime to light than is spent on the victim. I ask the men who've commented on this thread: what is it about some of you and many of your countrymen that allows you to think that sexual assault of a woman or girl is something 'small'? I wonder if sexual assault on your person, or your sons would be some small matter that we can move from?
Dear Dineo:
In some things, there is what is written on the line, and then there is what is written between the lines. Please re-read what I wrote, especially a line such as this one
"it's time to move on and focus in bigger things; Vision 2030 arrives tomorrow"
If tomorrow's Vision 2030, Middle-Income announcement is something that will change the life of any Kenyan as soon as the announcement is made ... if we can confirm that ... if you believe that I believe that ... then it is definitely a Bigger Thing. But if not, then we should re-evaluate what I wrote.
A little story about a little story about little people:
Swift's Gulliver's Travels is, in my opinion, a great book. Full of interesting little stories. In one of these little stories Gulliver wakes up to a terrible din by the Lilliputians: the Queen's palace is on fire, and there is not enough water around. What to do?
Fortunately or unfortunately---this turns out to be a HUGE question---earlier that evening the royalty of Lilliput had been entertaining an important delegation from Blefuscu. And in the celebrations Gulliver had enjoyed much wine. So when he heard "fire! fire!", it did not take much for him to pull out tarimbo and put out the fire. That, to my mind, should have been "great! fantastic! the palace is safe!" And that's what most reasonable folk would think. I think.
Far from it. Huge mistake by Gulliver.
(a) First, Lilliputian law was very strict about urinating in public. With no exceptions that would allow any form of "beneficial public urination".
(b) Second, while he had indeed put out the fire, there was the hard & unpleasant fact that he had pissed on the palace and left it stinking of piss. A whole palace! Of Royalty!
The first of these was quickly solved. Relatively speaking. So to speak. After much discussion and consultations on Lilliputian Law, it was agreed that the King had the power to pardon Gulliver in the crime of public urination.
The second was more problematic. And the reason it was so problematic is this: the fire in question had started in the Queen's rooms, and that is where Gulliver had focused his tarimbo. No matter how they put it to the Queen she had a clear---and, perhaps, quite legitimate or at least somewhat understandable---point: Bugger the good intentions. The obvious and stinking fact was that the fellow had pissed all over her rooms. And on clothes, furniture, and perhaps even on her and her courtiers!. Nobody could deny that, especially given the stench all around. She was extremely upset and swore to never again stay in any of those rooms and moved Gulliver to what these days would be called her D-List.
Read the story. It's a very interesting one, like most of the tales of Gulliver's Travels.
Anyways ...
I first read that story something like over 25 years ago. I liked it, and it made quite an impression on me. I then decided that:
If I ever run into a person who's on fire, I'll piss on him or her, if necessary. But I won't wait for the "thank you".
And that's how it's been for a long time: I piss on fires, but many a time people see only the piss---not the fact that I'm trying to do my bit to put out the fire.
But enough of Gulliver ...
The attention that this Drunken Bum and The Poet have received is quite something. (Comrade OO has officially noted his amazement.) Fortunately, it will now be dealt with by The Authorities. Statements recorded, people trailed, etc. Once we are done with that, we can turn to the little matters that affect women, such as the primitive and barbaric horror as FGM. And did you know that under Kenyan law there is no such thing as marital rape? If a married man decides that he wants "it", he can legally get "it" by whatever means he deems necessary---and many frequently use "by any and all means necessary". Women are daily forced to give their bodies to riff-raff men just to get simple drinking water. To endure this or that other bit of male nastiness. To suffer this and to suffer that. ... Dot, dot, dot. Incredible list if one actually thinks about it. Lots of other little stuff out there if one really thinks of the situation of women in the real realities of Real Kenya ... Plenty of Legitimate TNT for the War Of The Genders. But, first, The Bum & The Poet. The big one.
Listen, keep fighting the good fight. And never mind the piss. All men are dogs, and all dogs piss all over the place. (My beagle seems to have an average of 15 metres whenever I walk him.) Filthy and nasty beasts, the entire lot. But sometimes some of them mean well. Even when they piss on you.
|
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Sept 30, 2014 8:46:05 GMT 3
Ever since we launched Jukwaa way back in August 2005, I have NEVER seen a SINGLE THREAD go this viral over such a short time!OO It all depends on what you mean by "viral". viral ˈvʌɪr(ə)l/Submit adjective 1. of the nature of, caused by, or relating to a virus or viruses. 2. (of an image, video, piece of information, etc.) circulated rapidly and widely from one Internet user to another. "a viral ad campaign" Going by the second definition of multiple users, I don't think this thread has gone viral at all. The first page is dominated by Admin posting different takes on the saga, a trend that continued for a whole 48 hours before Kamale chimed in. Indeed over 80% of the posts are by Admin who kept the story alive. If by viral you meant the number of eyeballs (or hits) that the thread has had then that might be another issue. But a more accurate assessment may have been you haven't seen a thread go this viral since the CORDed Brigade abandoned ship on the eve of the last elections. I don't know Shailja or Mochama & have never read any of their work. However I remain somewhat troubled when a human rights advocate tramples on the rights of someone who isn't capable of defending himself on Jukwaa in what is a "he said, she said" situation because he's ordered to do so. All this at a time when the victim wasn't even willing to report the alleged crime to the authorities but was happy enough to have the perp tarred & feathered via social media, an injustice in the making best captured by Lynn Muthoni Wanyeki. I suppose the Mochama is a "public figure" angle can be used for outing him but given the scanty details we have to date about the whole thing (what the nature of the groping was, why she didn't file charges sooner or even bother leading the viral attacks on social media before that) the fact that alcohol flowed like the River Jordan should've been enough to have people hold their tongues until things became clearer. Anyway, now Mochama's wife has decided to stand by her man so let me do my bit to keep the drama going:  Tony Mochama’s Wife Jumps to His Defence Over Sex Assault Allegations 30 September 2014 , By Richard Kamau Wife to popular author and columnist Tony Mochama has come out to defend her husband over the sexual assault allegations levelled against him by Shailja Patel last week. Sharon claims that Shailja has been witch hunting her husband since 2006. “I want this to go on record. My husband met Shailja in Lamu in 2006 and it was then when she said he would not make it as a writer. In 2007, she openly snubbed Tony at a Go Down function, while in 2008, after he had given a brilliant reading at the Sunday Salon session in Kengele’s Lavington, Shailja complained Kwani we had a ‘drunk’ artiste.” “Finally, on the Friday of July 17, 2009, Smitta in his Scene@ column (Pulse Magazine) had a humorous crack at her about their beef and her stiff approach to life and poetry. I believe it is this malice that has led her to tell bitter lies everywhere against Smitta,” Sharon told Pulse. “My hubby has never and has no need to sexually assault anybody in his life and we as a family stand by him in this time of a bitter witch-hunt by some ill-meaning individuals,” she added. m.nairobiwire.com/2014/09/tony-mochamas-wife-jumps-defence-sex-assault-allegations.html/I find the last sentence illuminating... |
|
|
|
Post by Luol Deng on Sept 30, 2014 10:18:33 GMT 3
OK,
This story keeps mutating. I am not a lawyer but the statement that has been made by the various bodies and individuals on this alleged sexual assault is strange to say the least. It begins by condemning the alleged act, an act that has been denied by the alleged perpetrator and has been corroborated by his witnesses. The statement then, almost as an afterthought, goes on to state that the accused is innocent until proven guilty. It then gives a prescription on how the case has to be handled implicitly giving the only acceptable outcome of the process. As I stated before, the handling of this entire episode was disgraceful. One of the signatories to that statement was responsible for reporting the matter to the twitter police station, another is the owner of the house in question. The owner of the house wasn't present during the reported episode, yet she had enough information to call Mochama a rapist.
Sexual violence and other forms of gender based violence are unfortunately far too prevalent, and such acts should not be tolerated by any responsible citizen. What I cannot and will not do is to engage in a witch hunt. The matter has been reported, the police are supposed to take up the investigation on the same. The accused remains innocent until proven guilty as noted in the statement. That being that, we are still expected to condemn this alleged incident with the scanty information that we have been furnished thus far? This group has to get something clear, we have a justice system which they have decided to use. It is there to dispense justice according to the facts available, not according to what they think.
The accused's witnesses have in no uncertain terms stated that several of Shailja's witnesses are lying. I can therefore not take sides on this issue until it is satisfactorily handled by the necessary institutions. But if the way this issue has been handled thus far is anything to go by, I don't think we'll ever get to the bottom of this issue.
Dineo,
I respect your opinion, although as stated earlier, the bungling of this issue by prof. Mwangi & the other witnesses fundamentally affects this case for the worse. What would have been the problem with reporting the issue to the police then proceeding to twitter to disclose to their considerable number of followers what happened, the steps that have been taken and leaving the responsibility of bringing the suspect to book to the relevant institutions?
Instead, we have a case where the alleged crime occurs in the presence of witnesses who do nothing. They stick around doing nothing for another day before descending on twitter in a co-ordinated effort roughly 36 hours later. They were completely unwilling to report the matter to the police, if anything, they proceeded to call the institutions all manner of names and went on to berate anyone who thought justice will be delivered. In the end, it seems like the cooler heads of the likes of Muthoni Wanyeki (whom I have very little respect for) prevailed. Although even the likes of Muthoni couldn't help resist interfering with the process with their ill timed statement.
|
|
|
|
Post by jakaswanga on Sept 30, 2014 18:37:14 GMT 3
b6k! I really do not know what you mean by the illumination you find in that picture! But I think you are correct this is a 'stand by your man' moment. We saw it with Dr. Mboya Kidero on the ''sehemu nyeti' day; we saw it with Hilary Clinton on the day blowjobs ceased to be sex; we also saw it with the wife of a man named Spitzer in New York when a hooker stole his heart. Let us hope Mrs. B6k, or Mrs. Jakaswanga are of such vintage breed, who stand by their men, comforting whatever the charge from detractors! But I think you are harassing Mr. Oloo when you trash his amazement at the virality of this thread. I am not sure about your calender, but did the Shebesh-Kidero bash happen after the 'caliphate mob' decamped from Pyongyang to their kumbaya hole? or not? --because that was sure viral! hits defination that is! |
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Sept 30, 2014 19:23:02 GMT 3
“My hubby has never and has no need to sexually assault anybody in his life and we as a family stand by him in this time of a bitter witch-hunt by some ill-meaning individuals,” she added.
...that to me comes across as famous last words. Can anyone really vouch for their better half 100% especially where the said spouse enjoys more than their fair share of tipple? Well for her sake I hope she's right that he has "no need to" graze beyond the kraal.
As for the caliphate foot soldiers, don't forget it took a while for the vegetation site to gain traction so it was still common to have some stray beheading forays here before the kumbayas were harmonized...
|
|
|
|
Post by abdulmote on Sept 30, 2014 23:56:51 GMT 3
B6,
Very striking those words: "has no need to sexually assault anybody in his life"
It is as if she meant to say that Mochama's needs are fully satisfied, well catered for...content, ameshiba.
Sometimes I don't know whether to be puzzled or simply accept what some women can have the courage to come up with! I really admire that! Sooo fake!
I have always maintained that men are not designed to exist as monogamous potentials. Simply not. Otherwise by now some of us would be ovulating every four weeks or so. But instead, we are always ready with tank fulls of millions of tailed predators, hungrily seeking to infuse their genes into the mother of all eggs! Any time. That is the design.
Anything else is artificial. It would take a lot of extra ordinary conditioning to abstain from it all. Ask that fellow from some where in Nyanza called O...something Danger. He was a fine example with a handful of wives and dozens of hungry off springs.
As for our good fellow Mochama, he must have laughed his head off, be it secretly, after his wife's comments as given above. "he has no need...in his life..."."What the heck", he must be thinking. "I never knew I could get away with it...but damn,...women must be programmed to accept our makeup. The rest is just pretenses...".
But don't just get me wrong. I only mean the bit with his wife and not the said sexual assault on Shahilja...lest you are tempted to twist this into something else.
Personally, I don't like the idea of 'one size fits all' approach in everything human. Every crime should be measured on its severity. For those who know and have experienced, they will tell you that it is never easy even to the complainant, when faced with issues of crimes committed, police reports and prospects of being a witness in court. In reality, even a simple matter can take over somebody's life and can be extremely traumatizing, to the accused as well as the accuser.
Going back to Mochama: Had I been him, with the capacity to swallow jugs of the intoxicating brew and still be able to remain steady on my feet...even if with risk of throwing up or shitting in my pants!...If I was to have such stupidity in me and the mind of an un-contemplating idiot...I think given the circumstances, I would have been busy trying to grab any skirt near me! And not just for the sake of being offensive or out the nature of being criminally minded, but perhaps of being, even if for a moment, out of my mind and not knowing what was I about to commit, irrespective of what my sober mind could be capable of thinking and writing! Totally insane that is.
But then, thank God I am not Mochama and I am no where near drunk and skirts hunting to boot!
|
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Oct 1, 2014 9:54:23 GMT 3
Abdulmote I agree with you on all counts. As you said the biological drive doesn't excuse the crime, if indeed Mochama did break the law. Unfortunately for him, some of the details we know (he was too inebriated to walk without support & couldn't even remember he was at the bash!...not a good thing to admit when you hint you have no idea of your actions) indicate he might have. But that still doesn't mean it was okay to crucify the guy in the social media for a crime even the victim initially had no intention to report to the authorities. Sadly these civil society types are proving to be not so civil yet again...
|
|
|
|
Post by Luol Deng on Oct 1, 2014 12:34:14 GMT 3
b6k,
The too drunk to walk count immediately contradicts a fundamental testimony that was put forth on social media. One of the 'witnesses' stated that Tony assaulted Shailja then left laughing with his *friends*. Tony's witness, Wanjeri Nderu, stated clearly that he was too inebriated to walk and it was Wanjeri alone who walked him to the car and neither was he laughing. It is on the basis of such inconsistent testimonies that we are being asked to join the mob against Tony. I'm still watching this story keenly.
|
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Oct 1, 2014 14:37:16 GMT 3
Luol Deng, you'd be surprised on what a staggering, slurring drunk can be capable of since he wasn't comatose or led out on a stretcher. That said I still think it was premature to tar & feather the guy before all the facts were in.
By the way just out of curiosity, what's your beef with Muthoni Wanyeki?
|
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Oct 1, 2014 16:59:26 GMT 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Oct 1, 2014 17:11:02 GMT 3
|
|
|
|
Post by b6k on Oct 1, 2014 17:11:13 GMT 3
OO, one man's petty is another man's stickler to detail.
b6k
Jukwaa Petty Officer
|
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Oct 1, 2014 17:22:48 GMT 3
OO, one man's petty is another man's stickler to detail. b6k Jukwaa Petty Officer By the way, this thread is NOT about Oloo, b6k or even Shailja. It is about SEXUAL ASSAULT. oo |
|
|
|
Post by abdulmote on Oct 1, 2014 21:00:37 GMT 3
Sometimes I tend to struggle understanding what some women tend to come up with in the face of some sexual issues that might have happened to some other women.
A woman is attacked by a man, abusive, perhaps violent, a drunkard, uncultured, uncivilised, or even simply insane. Next someone comes with up with all protective phrases, ring fencing all women's bodies, not allowed to be touched, caressed, smooched, loved, kissed, slept with or even simply cared for.
It is as if they are the militant women's warriors, ready to defend and exclude each one of them, from the reckless manly beasts, out there to grab everyone's ass or kiss every one's lips or do other things, loving or to be enjoyed, just as men and women are meant to do under 'normal' circumstances.
Why do I have to be made to feel alienated from my beloved woman, of years, decades or a lifetime of close and intimate relationship? What has anyone got to do with it, my woman, my wife, my babe, simply because the other happens to imagine that they are better and more capable than mine? No one has the right, whether a woman or not, to decide or dictate what my woman can or cannot do.
To me this feels like an insult. To be classified under one roof, with others who may have lost their self control to natural weakness embedded in their miserable souls. Why assume that every man is the same, weak and reckless before a woman's flesh, uncaring, stupid and even unthinking?
No woman! I am not that weak, or among the foolish and sexually greedy men! I don't tremble with exitement whenever I come across a good pair of tits, a well curved ass or a shiny fabric boosting the illusion men like to stair at and fantasize with glee.
I am who I am. respect me and I respect you back. I am never desperate for feminine bodies even if I may desire the natural flavors of life enjoyable by all natural beings.
I have my woman and I love her. I have a right and privilege to hold her and to touch her in any manner we may please or desire. And no, nobody, whether a woman or otherwise, has a right of telling me what I cannot do with my woman's body! Period!
Ni hivyo tu!
|
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Oct 1, 2014 23:22:53 GMT 3
 Dr. Wambui Mwangi on her Facebook page: Comments to Wambui: |
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Oct 1, 2014 23:27:06 GMT 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Onyango Oloo on Oct 2, 2014 13:47:02 GMT 3
|
|
tales about drunken black males with wanton appetites unleashed on coy and delicate Asian flesh!? This is a scandal which dredges a dark but explosive taboo area! and then airs it all there for a free for all in a liberated republic!
